Search for: "Reading v. Attorney General" Results 7061 - 7080 of 14,176
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2017, 4:30 am by Peter Mahler
The former partner’s appeal challenges the award against him totaling over $1.5 million (plus interest) for the prevailing partners’ attorney’s and expert fees incurred in the litigation as “damages” to be deducted from the value of his partnership interest under Partnership Law § 69. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 1:18 pm by Jane Chong
Some other important processing points: attorney-client communications must comply with any guidance promulgated by the Assistant Attorney General for National Security, and an IC element receiving raw SIGINT may conduct communications metadata analysis, including contact chaining, without regard to the communicants' location or nationality (though again, only for valid foreign intelligence or counterintelligence purposes). [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 2:04 pm by David Markus
While serving as attorney general, Pryor wrote a brief in defense of the Texas law banning sodomy that was later struck down in Lawrence v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am by Tejinder Singh
Attorney for the Southern District of Iowa in 2000. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:49 am by Ronald Mann
” And Justice Samuel Alito was pointedly concerned that Wu’s reading of the statute on behalf of the solicitor general of New York would not bind district attorneys throughout the state: “How do we know how all of these other district attorneys are going to interpret the statute? [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 10:16 pm by Marie-Andree Weiss
” This is catnip for IP attorneys, especially IP attorneys writing for a cousin of The IPKat blog. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am by Abbott & Kindermann
        2015 CEQA UPDATE  To read the 2015 cumulative CEQA review, click here:  B. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 7:11 am by Susan Hennessey
The President-elect has failed to divest from his business holdings, refused to release his tax returns, and insisted that a federal anti-nepotism law won’t bar his children—who themselves retain private business interests—from serving in his White House. [read post]