Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 7061 - 7080
of 19,250
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2024, 9:30 pm
Part II, which will run in our Fall / Winter ’24 issue, will focus on the post-World War II decades when the pendulum began to swing the other way and state law evolved to make voting easier and broaden voting rights, while maintaining the integrity of voting systems.Next, Mitchell Keiter looks back at the Robins v. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 5:43 pm
Today, the Sixth Circuit affirmed on all grounds in United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 11:24 am
The advertisements prominently featured the mark Swarovski (replete with the circled-R registered trademark symbol). [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 4:40 pm
United States [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 3:23 am
The IP Watchdog gave an overview of the relevant principles non-profit organisations should bear in mind to avoid consumer confusion.The Kluwer Trademark Blog discussed whether descriptive terms in languages which do not hold official EU language status might still be deemed to give rise to a likelihood of confusion where there is nevertheless a significant population in at least one EU Member State which speaks that language - whether that is Russian in Germany or the Baltic… [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 9:30 pm
Mark Graber disputes the significance of the latest discovery of Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman related to whether the President is an Office of the United States for purposes of Section 3 of the fourteenth Amendment (Balkinization).ICYMI: The failed attempt to rename Brown v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 3:09 am
People v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
Garnett & Mitchell Koppinger, Tandon v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 2:18 am
Seacrets, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 3:15 pm
Roach v. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 4:30 pm
Ed. 2d 351 (internal quotation marks omitted), "real and immediate," Los Angeles v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 11:06 am
Jersey Media Group Inc., 201 N.J. 500, 523 (2010) (discussing fair-report privilege and stating that “[a] fair report need not be a verbatim report; it is enough that the report be a rough-and-ready summary that is substantially correct” (citations and internal quotation marks omitted)). [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:26 am
Mark Wightman and DavidO. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 3:37 pm
Pa. 2008); United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
Legal also noted a recent court decision involving Chapter 173, McCauley v New York State Local Employees' Retirement System, 37 Misc 3d 868. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 12:09 pm
Co. v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:47 pm
Company v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 8:40 am
App. to Pet. for Cert. 75a (internal quotation marks omitted); Madison v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 3:54 am
The other is State v. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 2:51 pm
Mark Adams Both federal and state laws prohibit employers from discriminating against employees because of their religion. [read post]
