Search for: "State v. Word"
Results 7061 - 7080
of 40,664
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2020, 6:28 am
Rewriting the history of the DSM Directive – Part 1 by Julia Reda “EU Member States are currently grappling with the task of implementing the Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market (DSM Directive) into national law. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 5:01 am
In other words, a suit against an individual official does not automatically entail a suit against a sovereign state (though that objection may be raised where it applies). [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 3:46 pm
The question before the justices in Federal Republic of Germany v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 1:57 pm
On Tuesday, in Facebook v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 11:52 am
The case is Catlett v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 7:29 am
This is true in most states, including Florida. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm
I have defended detainees at the base since shortly after they arrived and was lead counsel in Rasul v. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 5:06 pm
In other words, the settlement functions as a sub rosa plan. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:50 pm
See United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:45 pm
The Times immediately removed the article after it was contacted by Cage but did not agree a satisfactory wording for its correction, and the organisation and Begg both subsequently launched libel claims. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 11:20 am
Nikolaeva v London Borough of Redbridge (2020) EWCA Civ 1586 A quick note on this Court of Appeal decision concerning offers of permanent accommodation in discharge of duty. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 10:32 am
In a case with significant ramifications for employers concerned with protecting sensitive information, and for employees accused of abusing access to computer networks, the United States Supreme Court (“SCOTUS”) heard oral argument this week in Van Buren v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 3:21 am
KGAA v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 2:40 pm
While its wording is fairly clear—it states that "No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider" —it is still widely misunderstood. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 1:22 pm
But let's just read the words. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 9:36 am
" Mandel v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 8:58 am
Selected Related Posts About State Action Claims LinkedIn Isn’t a State Actor–Perez v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 8:40 am
In Muransky v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:37 pm
Simon and Alexander v. [read post]
