Search for: "W. D." Results 7061 - 7080 of 13,768
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2013, 10:56 am by Dennis Crouch
If it had contracted with a foreign publisher then Duvall could have brought the action in the USITC.  Read the complaint: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_b15LgT1GHYUGd6YnYxS1RWNjQ/edit? [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 12:09 am by Rechtsanwalt
Damit dämmten die Wände nicht, sondern verstärkten die Geräusche sogar noch. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 5:00 am by Michael Risch
Even the court notes that this is an uncomfortable ruling: “[W]hile technological change may have rendered Section 109(a) unsatisfactory to many contemporary observers and consumers, it has not rendered it ambiguous. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 4:00 am by Michael Risch
Even the court notes that this is an uncomfortable ruling: “[W]hile technological change may have rendered Section 109(a) unsatisfactory to many contemporary observers and consumers, it has not rendered it ambiguous. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am by INFORRM
Neil Turner v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 12/04/2013; Ms Carina Trimingham v Daily Mirror, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Ms Carina Trimingham v Metro, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Bath & North East Somerset Council v The Times, Clause 5, 11/04/2013; Warren Hamilton Daily Mai, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Catherine Whiteside The Scottish Sun, Clauses 1, 5, 11/04/2013; Ms Lynne Hales v Daily Mail, Clause 6, 11/04/2013; Emilie Sandy v The Citizen (Gloucester) v The Citizen (Gloucester), Clause 5, 11/04/2013; North Wales Fire… [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 6:17 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”  He repeatedly testified “[w]e don't believe [consumers] were ever confused. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 5:46 am by Susan Brenner
  The Court of Appeals began its analysis of the argument by noting that “[w]hen the prosecution demonstrates, by competent evidence, that there is probable cause to believe that (1) a felony was committed and (2) the defendant committed the crime, a district court must bind the defendant over to the circuit court for trial. [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 5:37 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
A is for Annualized Income Installment Method B is for Bad Debt Expense C is for Carpooling D is for Disaster Relief E is for Educational Assistance F is for Fellowships and Scholarships G is for Government Debt H is for Hardship Withdrawal. [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 5:20 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
You can catch up on the rest of the series here: A is for Annualized Income Installment Method B is for Bad Debt Expense C is for Carpooling D is for Disaster Relief E is for Educational Assistance F is for Fellowships and Scholarships G is for Government Debt H is for Hardship Withdrawal. [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 10:14 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
No matter the reason, bonuses are considered taxable income to the recipient and should be included on your federal form W-2. [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 8:18 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
You can catch up on the rest of the series here: A is for Annualized Income Installment Method B is for Bad Debt Expense C is for Carpooling D is for Disaster Relief E is for Educational Assistance F is for Fellowships and Scholarships G is for Government Debt H is for Hardship Withdrawal. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 1:56 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Would registration numbers still be enough to use in a C&D? [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:13 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Words/names not initially registrable apart from where they’d already been used/acquired a reputation—going forward, no registration of names/words, but rather symbols and devices. [read post]