Search for: "Bills v. State"
Results 7081 - 7100
of 21,856
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2018, 10:52 am
He’s Wrong * Senate’s “Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act of 2017”–and Section 230’s Imminent Evisceration * The “Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act of 2017” Bill Would Be Bad News for Section 230 * WARNING: Draft “No Immunity for Sex Traffickers Online Act” Bill Poses Major Threat to Section 230 * The Implications of Excluding State Crimes from 47 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 9:56 am
In A.H.W. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am
Key Findings Property tax limitations have been adopted in forty-six states and the District of Columbia, though their designs and restrictiveness differ widely. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 5:00 am
Knauff v. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 9:00 am
FDA states (emphasis added): Medical Device Data Systems (MDDS) are hardware or software products that transfer, store, convert formats, and display medical device data. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 2:11 pm
Supreme Court confirmed in Barron v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 6:45 am
Still, Steinthal expressed skepticism that these proposed bills would resolve the statutory damages problem that entrenches the current statutory scheme.Joshua Graubart (The Law Offices of Joshua Graubart, P.C.) reviewed the UK High Court decision from Mr Justice Arnold in Gloucester Place Music v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 4:48 am
In Chicago v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 6:04 am
(The bill expands this latter category to encompass those groups that are considered either associated forces or splinter groups under the 2001 AUMF, though it excludes sovereign states.) [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 4:36 am
In Collins v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 7:14 pm
The court compared it to a prior Massachusetts case, Kniskern v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 2:06 pm
The Supreme Court showed no great interest in the bankruptcy problem at the heart of Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 12:22 pm
Jaeger (Voting Rights) State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2018.htmlMendoza v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 12:17 pm
Jaeger (Voting Rights) State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2018.htmlMendoza v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 8:55 am
In Eda Ema, LLC v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 4:08 am
” In a brief per curiam decision, the justices also dismissed United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 8:40 pm
Perhaps it would still be an effective resolution, as courts aren't going to question the procedures by which a bill was adopted, but I don't think it would get the benefit of the CRA's statutory effect of prohibiting the reenactment of a rule that is "substantially the same. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 3:32 pm
State in 2015 and ... [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 2:47 pm
Global Oil Tools, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 1:11 pm
In a brief per-curium, or unsigned, order, the Court dismissed United States v. [read post]
