Search for: "Chief Justice of the United States" Results 7081 - 7100 of 14,933
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2009, 4:01 pm
But it proceeded apace during the years that Chief Justice Earl Warren led a progressive Court. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 10:30 am by Lisa McElroy
Roberts, Jr., the Chief Justice of the United States? [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 1:35 am by Seán Binder
Atomwaffen Division’s founder and an associate were charged this year in the United States after being accused of planning to attack Baltimore’s power grid. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 10:20 am
" David Salmons, Assistant to the Solicitor General, argued next on behalf of the United States as an amicus in support of petitioners. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 9:00 pm by Cody Poplin
    Employment Announcements (More details on the Job Board) Deputy Chief, Counterespionage Section ORGANIZATION: Department of Justice SALARY RANGE: $124,995 – $157,100 DEADLINE: Dec. 8, 2014 POSITION INFORMATION: Permanent DUTY LOCATIONS: Washington, DC WHO MAY APPLY: US Citizens SECURITY CLEARANCE: Top Secret/SCI with CI JOB SUMMARY: The Counterespionage Section (CES) investigates, prosecutes, and supervises the investigation and prosecution of cases… [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 9:00 pm by Cody Poplin
  Employment Announcements (More details on the Job Board) Deputy Chief, Counterespionage Section ORGANIZATION: Department of Justice SALARY RANGE: $124,995 – $157,100 DEADLINE: Dec. 8, 2014 POSITION INFORMATION: Permanent DUTY LOCATIONS: Washington, DC WHO MAY APPLY: US Citizens SECURITY CLEARANCE: Top Secret/SCI with CI JOB SUMMARY: The Counterespionage Section (CES) investigates, prosecutes, and supervises the investigation and prosecution of cases… [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 1:05 pm
Gonzales now feels to have won confirmation as Attorney General of the United States. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 6:38 am by MBettman
At issue in this case is whether the Supreme Court of Ohio should update and clarify its attorney fee jurisprudence by adopting the United States Supreme Court’s guidance in Perdue v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 10:05 pm
A specific change in the delivery of opinions has happened at least three times on a grand scale: (1) Chief Justice Mansfield's change from traditional seriatim opinions to an "opinion of the court" in England circa 1760; (2) a similar change in the United States Supreme Court upon the ascendancy of John Marshall to Chief Justice in 1801; and (3) the development of a tradition of writing separately during the New Deal era of the… [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 11:48 am
A specific change in the delivery of opinions has happened at least three times on a grand scale: (1) Chief Justice Mansfield's change from traditional seriatim opinions to an "opinion of the court" in England circa 1760; (2) a similar change in the United States Supreme Court upon the ascendancy of John Marshall to Chief Justice in 1801; and (3) the development of a tradition of writing separately during the New Deal era of the… [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 8:10 am by Ilya Somin
” They are binding on all courts in the United States. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 2:38 pm by Erin McCarthy Holliday
Aurelius Investment argued that because Puerto Rico is within the United States and concerns US citizens and US currency, PROMESA’s Board powers are in fact national in scope: It presides over the largest municipal bankruptcy proceeding in United States history, managing over $100 billion in indebtedness, 165,000 claims, including over 200 claw-back actions, lawsuits against major financial institutions, in a proceeding in an Article III district court… [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:55 pm by Lyle Denniston
— now the Chief Justice – on the subject “Article III Limits on Statutory Standing. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 3:16 am
Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration ordecision of this motion.06-713 ) WASHINGTON STATE GRANGE V. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 6:35 am
In that role he was part of a high profile church-state controversy involving the removal of Alabama's Chief Justice Roy Moore.Judge Middlebrooks dissenting argued that the prayer policies of the county violate the Lemon test because they have both a religious purpose and effect and involve excessive entanglement of the state with religion. [read post]