Search for: "DOES I-X"
Results 7081 - 7100
of 7,403
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2007, 2:24 pm
This seems like a minor capability, but I’ve already used it a few times and it really does make event scheduling faster and easier. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 11:23 am
In this case, even if the company is no longer going to view the original review as "official", because it was presented to and signed by employee X, under California law I would think X does have a right to a copy. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 11:23 am
In this case, even if the company is no longer going to view the original review as "official", because it was presented to and signed by employee X, under California law I would think X does have a right to a copy. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 8:33 am
You need N-d to specify what judges should do, given interpretation N-i; without it, you have no reason to prefer Result X, entailed by N-d and N-i, to inconsistent Result Y, which follows from N-i and a different normative theory of decision-making, N-d2. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 10:51 am
I am not sure that this is correct. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
According to one press report, Angel Diaz "appeared to be moving 24 minutes after the first injection, grimacing, blinking, licking his lips, blowing and appearing to mouth words". [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 10:00 am
A voter using an optical scan machine does not see how the computer reads their vote, so confusion is still possible. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:17 am
Congrats again to Joanne and the NCRSASL on Res Communis, a University of Mississippi blog covering aerospace which does include air law but we can overlook that. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 7:48 am
An ordinal function tells us that individual i prefers possible world X to possible world Y, but it doesn't tell us whether X is much better than Y or only a little better. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 7:10 pm
App'x 386 (5th Cir. 2007). [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 11:35 am
If you'd told the truth about strokes I'd have been so scared I wouldn't have bought your product at all, no matter what my prescriber told me, and I wouldn't have been gotten kidney failure…. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 5:30 pm
I won't ask you how you decide. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 2:58 pm
I've seen plays where they sent backers, stunted, and dropped defensive linemen all on the same play. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 5:25 am
" Where, then, does this leave us? [read post]
20 Oct 2007, 12:43 pm
Why does law porn exist? [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 10:16 am
" (And she does some of her best legal drafting and advising with that in mind.)Speaking of FAA: Here's the busy agency's final Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact for Experimental Permits for 2007 X Prize Cup (Oct. 2007) Go Lunar Landing Challengers! [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 9:27 am
So why does everyone freak out on Halloween when facts show, no child has been harmed by a sex offender on this day? [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 5:57 am
[I]t does little to increase happiness thereafter. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 9:35 am
I mentioned here my contention that the only way to cross-examine an expert witness about his conclusions is to know at least as much, if not more about the narrow subject of his testimony that hurts you than he does. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 8:11 am
Does anyone else have other ideas? [read post]
