Search for: "Harding v. State" Results 7081 - 7100 of 15,892
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2013, 6:56 am
The article recites various reasons for the failure of the ad: (i) "[t]he company is moving away from upbeat ads promoting product features toward ones that identify it as a reliable provider of products"; (ii) Per Professor of |Advertising Edward Boches, "[i]n a manifesto ad, it's hard not to come across as self indulgent; (iii) "the ad lacks joy;"; (iv) the ad is too long; and (v) further referring to Professor Boches' observations, the ad's reference to the State of… [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 4:59 am
The Batmobile has been depicted in a variety of forms over the years, and when comparing the Batmobile in the recent Dark Knight movie, and, for example, the 1960s TV show version, it has hard to say they are cut from the same cloth. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 3:39 am
  (This situation is not confined to the Federal system, either; two years ago in State v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 12:53 pm by Daniel Tokaji
While emphasizing that there is no “litmus-paper test” and that “hard judgments” are necessary, the court said that “the State’s important regulatory interests are generally sufficient to justify reasonable, nondiscriminatory restrictions. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 4:39 am by Amy Howe
” At Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Ruthann Robson notes that judges in several lower courts have relied on Justice Scalia’s dissent in United States v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
In the Anheuser-Busch case, the importation from the USA of bottled beer under the BUDWEISER mark for use and sale in US military and diplomatic establishments within the UK did not entitle the plaintiff to establish what Lord Oliver later stated was the first element of a passing off claim. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:51 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
  Her article on multinational securities class actions was cited in both the majority opinion and Justice Stevens’ concurring opinion in Morrison v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Civil rights laws throughout state and federal law are riddled with limitations, exemptions, exceptions, and excuses that no hard and pure theory could sustain.Charges of bigotry are designed to fence in the bigot. [read post]
4 May 2013, 12:52 pm by Kevin Goldberg
 But none of them would have put their own hard-earned money on a 9-0 verdict. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 3:42 am by Russ Bensing
  The defendant in State v. [read post]