Search for: "Peoples v. United States"
Results 7081 - 7100
of 19,952
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2012, 9:58 pm
In response to the defendant's pre-sentence memorandum requesting leniency in sentencing, the District Attorney's Office, citing United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 2:00 am
Consider: The court quoted and emphasized the following language from United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 2:00 am
Consider: The court quoted and emphasized the following language from United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 11:06 am
Jackson and United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
However, the threat that ISIS sympathizers and other terrorists posing as refugees could seek admission to the United States as a means to commit terrorist acts is very real. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 4:49 am
COVID-19 COVID-19 has infected over 102.541 million people and has now killed over 1.11 million people in the United States, according to data compiled by Johns Hopkins University. [read post]
12 Feb 2022, 5:42 am
The moving defendant’s burden is to demonstrate that the act or acts of which the plaintiff complains were taken ‘in furtherance of the defendant’s right of petition or free speech under the United States or California Constitution in connection with a public issue,’ as defined in the statute. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 10:24 am
Ohio or Roe v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:45 am
United States, a unanimous court held that a trial court can consider mandatory minimums for possessing firearms when sentencing a defendant for an underlying drug offense. [read post]
4 May 2010, 7:04 pm
In the now-famous/infamous case Pequignot v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 6:52 am
” James Mets – The United States Supreme Court’s decision in Florence v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 3:07 pm
I have no reason to believe that federal judges will be better at this than state legislatures; and state legislatures have the great advantages of doing harm in a more circumscribed area, of being able to correct their mistakes in a flash, and of being removable by the people. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 3:50 am
Adam Liptak reports for The New York Times that during yesterday’s argument in United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 12:14 pm
Our amicus brief in United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 1:50 am
Although one might think the United States Tax Court has jurisdiction to hear any dispute involving federal taxes, that is not so. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 2:29 pm
In United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 1:36 pm
From what I can tell, in those seizure actions, the courts issued an order (also ex parte) requiring a change in the DNS information which meant that people trying to access the domain names would now be directed to the following message: [This] domain name [has] been seized by ICE - Homeland Security Investigations, pursuant to a seizure warrant issued by a United States Court. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:57 pm
Frequently, Dean Chemerinsky argues appellate cases, including in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 2:28 pm
The case is Moncrieffe v. [read post]
