Search for: "ROBERTS V. UNITED STATES "
Results 7081 - 7100
of 9,855
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2024, 6:37 pm
”[7] To strip a foreign sovereign of immunity, such suit must involve (1) property taken in violation of international law, and (2)(a) such property must be present in the United States in connection with a commercial activity carried on by the foreign state, or (2)(b) must be possessed by an “agency or instrumentality” of the foreign state that also carries on commercial activity in the United States.[8] When claimants file… [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 6:53 am
Texas Office of the Attorney General, Medicaid Fraud Control Unit (MFCU): The MFCU is a specialized unit within the Texas Office of the Attorney General. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 10:00 am
This two-decade trend started in 1999 with United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 5:48 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 12:16 pm
United States Air Force case in the 9th Circuit, and the Cook v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 7:30 am
The Foundry also weighs in, focusing on Thomas’ remarks on the State of the Union speech. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:55 pm
On September 28, 2011, Judge Robert M. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 12:47 pm
In United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 10:17 am
Pritchard (1998), ‘United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 7:41 am
The victim in this case, United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:40 pm
United States, 98 U.S. 145 (1879) the Court explained states’ interests in regulating marriage with the simple declaration: “Upon [marriage] society may be said to be built. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 9:30 pm
United Grain Growers Ltd., supra, at para. 93. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 10:15 am
The privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States are denied to these plaintiffs by the government’s unconstitutional actions described here. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 12:33 pm
United States, 570 U. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 1:31 am
The government seizes property when it meaningfully interferes with the possessory interest in that property, a test offered in United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 2:33 pm
Surveillance is of critical importance in the investigation of serious and organised crime, in determining the extent and patterns of criminal behaviour, and in the gathering of evidence to construct a case against a suspect; thus it has been described as one of the most important legal weapons deployed by the United States against Mafia groups and families (see Jacobs, Busting the Mob: United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:45 am
On Monday, the Supreme Court decided a fun case with a funny title: United States Forest Service v. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 4:23 pm
But I think there is no reason to believe this and every reason to believe that he genuinely, if for many of us wrongly, believed that the highest security interests of the United States were involved. [read post]
27 May 2010, 7:11 am
” And at the Huffington Post, Brennan Center attorney Monica Youn responds to comments made on the Senate floor last week by Senator Mitch McConnell, who criticized Kagan’s support of the government’s position in Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 12:27 pm
United States, 440 U. [read post]
