Search for: "ROUNDS v. STATE"
Results 7081 - 7100
of 7,628
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2009, 1:54 am
Supreme Court in the now-infamous eminent domain case Kelo v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 3:00 pm
A juror in the States (all fools anyway?) [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 3:57 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 6:19 am
The court re-heard the case this fall and has not yet ruled for the second go-round. [read post]
14 Mar 2009, 8:38 pm
… In Butler v. [read post]
14 Mar 2009, 1:05 pm
Olson v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Securing Innovation) PriorSmart.com search tool, tracking patent documents (Competitive Info) (Patently-O) Patent damages as an incentive to transact (IP finance) IPscore, new patent evaluation toy (IP finance) Patent portfolios can pull companies out of financial rut (Law360) Global - Copyright Expanding the public domain: part zero (Creative Commons) Australia Pioneering decision on non-use: Pioneer Computers Australia Pty Limited v Pioneer KK (Australian… [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 3:00 am
RIAA continues filing lawsuits (Ars Technica) US Copyright – Decisions US Department of Justice: Texas man sentenced to 41 months prison for selling counterfeit software worth $1 million on websites (ContentAgenda) Eminem producers lose bid for massive iTunes royalties (Ars Technica) (Law360) Supreme Court to hear case brought by freelance writers against several major publishers and online media services on the electronic reproduction of freelance works: In re: Literary Works… [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 9:09 am
Massad, William V. [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 9:53 am
Brookview Holdings v. [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 3:09 pm
The defendant paid no proper regard to the stated vulnerability of the claimant. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 10:28 pm
" And blogging isn't any different.Updated: Beck/Herrmann are rounding up the coverage that they have received earned: Press Coverage of LevinePreviously at my site:Preemption v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 11:31 pm
But the more people who learn about law-making, the more people will participate in the process and the less likely we will have problems like this:From Powers v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 7:46 pm
" In Roe v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 10:13 pm
Alfonso, 759 F.2d at 736; United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 12:43 pm
Matter of Do Not Destroy Brooklyn v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 9:26 am
Roe v. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 4:10 am
., v. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 2:01 am
Pleasant Grove City, Utah v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 5:15 pm
See The Upper Deck Company v. [read post]
