Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 7081 - 7100 of 9,091
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2024, 3:42 pm by Daniel J. Gilman
District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued a decision yesterday in Ryan v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 7:26 am by Janai S. Nelson
  In instituting the nation’s first moratorium on state executions to permit a thorough review of the capital judicial process, Ryan made innocence central to his reasoning: “Until I can be sure with moral certainty that no innocent man or woman is facing a lethal injection, no one will meet that fate. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Consider three cases decided earlier this year.In New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In analyzing Monday’s landmark Supreme Court ruling in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 11:57 am by Eugene Volokh
Pursuant to Rule 7.1.1 of the Local Rules for the District of Delaware, counsel for Defendants state that they have conferred with counsel for Robocast. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 7:52 am
I’ve been thinking more about the Eleventh Circuit’s decision last week in United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 4:29 am by David DePaolo
An Appeals Panel agreed and Seabright sought judicial review; a Starr County District Court Judge granted summary judgment in favor of Maximina, and the 4th DCA upheld that decision last year.Seabright then asked the Texas Supreme Court to review - all the while, I presume, holding on to the death benefit money.Seabrights novel argument is that since the Supreme Court's 2010 decision in Leordeanu v. [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 9:07 am by Eric Goldman
The Supreme Court dismisses the Knight First Amendment v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Twenty-two states plus D.C. sued, and a district court enjoined the change. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 10:07 am by Glenn Cohen
But once there was the first chink in the armor, courts started asking themselves whether they should do more than just carve out a narrow exception. [read post]
6 May 2020, 11:43 am by Amy Howe
For a single district court to have a monopoly on the rule that will prevail nationwide until the Supreme Court weighs in is not consistent with good practice or the way that our judicial system works, Clement concluded. [read post]