Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 7081 - 7100
of 9,091
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2011, 4:30 am
Recently, in Tang v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 4:43 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit] United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 10:34 am
District Court for the District] of Kansas on charges of mail fraud, aggravated identity theft, and conspiracy to commit mail fraud and aggravated identity theft. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 3:43 am
Last week, in State v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 11:37 am
The district court enjoined California authorities from enforcing the statute, and the decision was affirmed by the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 11:05 am
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 4:00 am
Friday’s First Circuit opinion in Sony BMG v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm
The use of antebellum state court decisions to interpret the Second AmendmentC. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
The court also held that venue was proper in the District of Nevada. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 2:48 pm
Constitution On Monday, the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments in Awad v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 4:20 pm
The courts have decided that no claim in nuisance lies against a sewerage undertaker for lack of capacity in its sewers (Marcic v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 7:29 am
In other ways, the case paved new ground, as it reflects the Court’s first preemption of a state law – statutory or judicial – that did not specifically regulate arbitration agreements. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 1:53 pm
” The first clause of section 2 has generally been understood as “a policy guaranteeing the enforcement of private contractual arrangements” free of legislative interference from the states. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 1:45 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 7:59 am
The Chisms then brought the § 1983 suit noted above, after which the officers moved for summary judgment based on “qualified immunity” and the district court granted their motion. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 4:30 am
Mungo v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 6:07 pm
Hart v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 2:19 pm
COURTS AND JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Code Ann. (2011) § 3-1501. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:04 am
First, the claims against the State Defendants are based solely on judicial acts preformed by judges in their judicial capacity. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 9:22 am
In Pitts v. [read post]
