Search for: "State v. Holder"
Results 7081 - 7100
of 8,253
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2022, 8:28 am
The plaintiffs in Havlish v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 11:49 pm
See, e.g., Central Valley General Hosp. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 7:23 pm
LLC v W. [read post]
3 Sep 2007, 1:22 pm
Enron Corp. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 7:19 am
To retain a role for a political office holder in warrants such as these, and against the recommendations of the RUSI and Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation reports appears disproportionate. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 7:43 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Merck KGaA v. [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 7:43 pm
In another case this week, AT&T v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:20 am
The AG concluded that Member States may exclude reproduction devices from payment of levies when an objective justification exists. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 7:28 pm
The fundamental operative structure of the UNGP State duty to protect was grounded on the premise of international legality embedded within the principles of the state system. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 5:01 am
In 2012, Attorney General Holder issued a statement (Holder Memo) outlining the DOJ’s policy on coordinating parallel civil and criminal proceedings to enforce against fraud. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
A company called dkcb Pty Ltd opted to bring a auDRP complaint in 2017 (dkcb Pty Ltd v Eveready Pty Ltd). [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 11:12 am
The case, Stewart v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm
Apparently it was also brought forward during the meeting of the EPO’s Administrative Council late June by various member states. [read post]
4 May 2011, 2:26 pm
Hansen In Main Street Plaza v. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 6:42 am
U visas generally entitle their holders and their families to four years of nonimmigrant status; holders may also apply for a “green card” after three years. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 9:05 pm
Clear precedent, and subsequent decisions like MGM v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 11:17 am
The case cite is Almeda Mall, L.P. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm
Apparently it was also brought forward during the meeting of the EPO’s Administrative Council late June by various member states. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 3:10 pm
In Carsanaro v. [read post]
