Search for: "State v. Michael A." Results 7081 - 7100 of 13,677
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2022, 1:58 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The $1 billion payout covers claims against Michael Dell, other Dell directors, Silver Lake, as well as Goldman Sachs. [read post]
3 May 2012, 2:28 pm by Leanne Buckley-Thomson
Mr Justice Eder held that the correct approach was that the present legislation is presumed valid but, as stated by Lord Goff in Kirklees BC v Wickes Building Supplies Ltd [1993] AC 227, the existence of the alleged defence is to be taken into account in the exercise of the court’s discretion [paragraph 78]. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 7:15 am by Adam Chandler
Phelps, the funeral picketing case, and Bruesewitz v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:06 am by Edith Roberts
At CNN, Joan Biskupic explains that “[w]hat happens in [June Medical Services v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 4:46 am by Peter Mahler
Three weeks ago, I wrote about the Bak v Rostek case in Brooklyn Supreme Court addressing the duty to disclose third-party offers amidst buy-out negotiations between co-owners. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: ACTA continues to be discussed and debated: (Michael Geist), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge),  (Techdirt), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), Apotex challenge to Acular LS patent barred by res judicata: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan v… [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
It then goes on to cite fair use as "the same law that allows Weird Al Yankovic to use the music from Michael Jackson's 'Beat It' in his parody song 'Eat It'" (see here).Except that, of course, Dumb Starbucks is no ‘Eat It’. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 12:52 pm by Liisa Speaker
(Bowers v VanderMeulenBowers, 278 Mich App 287, 294; 750 NW2d 597 (2008). [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
To state the obvious, no emergency exists. [read post]