Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. " Results 7081 - 7100 of 8,929
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2011, 12:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
Among other cases that have survived are those involving Citigroup (refer here), AIG (here), Countrywide (here), Fannie Mae (here), Washington Mutual (here), New Century Financial (here), Sallie Mae (here) and Bank of America (here). [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 11:56 am by Rick
The United States of America was not founded to control. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 8:06 pm by Franco Tarulli
In July of last year, I wrote about the case of Gucci America, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 1:15 pm by Adam Schlossman
Brief for respondent Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America Title: McNeill, Clifton T. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 1:18 pm by Steve
We argued a similar limitations issue years ago in United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Trust v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 1:22 pm by WIMS
In this case, which was argued over two years ago (December 10, 2008), the United States of America appeals from two orders of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York which denied its applications for a restitution award in favor of the Republic of South Africa, pursuant to, first, the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996 (MVRA), and second, the Victim and Witness Protection Act of 1982 (VWPA). [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 12:38 am by John Day
Mazda Motors of America, and when the United States Supreme Court decides the case we will have a better understanding of the law of preemption. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:59 am by Danielle Citron
 Despite still believing Assange’s actions have been harmful, I have now come to the opposite conclusion—not for the benefit of Assange, but for the benefit of Americans and of the United States. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 8:36 am by Charley
Schwarzenegger in the federal United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 12:02 pm
Relying on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia’s decision in Sierra Club v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 4:04 pm by Marie Louise
: The need to encourage legal entrepreneurship (Spicy IP) State’s copyright not exempt under RTI Act: Delhi Metro Rail Corp. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am by Charon QC
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]