Search for: "United States v. Close" Results 7081 - 7100 of 14,200
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2015, 10:30 am by William Alderman
Commissioner, the SEC ALJs were “inferior officers” within the meaning of Article 2 because they exercised significant authority pursuant to the laws of the United States. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 7:59 pm by Michael Froomkin
You’d think it might…but she’s persuasive that it doesn’t…necessarily… In United States Supreme Court’s fragmented and closely divided decision in Kerry v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 5:17 pm
 She also adverted to Alice Corporation v CLS [noted on the IPKat here], to which the other speakers would later refer. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 3:00 pm by Charlie Dunlap
  In other words, it rejects the proposition reflected in the 1986 International Court of Justice case of Nicaragua v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 9:25 am by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In United States Supreme Court's fragmented and closely divided decision in Kerry v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:29 am by John Elwood
For the first time since this crusty old man was on the bar mitzvah circuit, the United States has a Triple Crown winner. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:55 am by Joy Waltemath
The employer’s motion for summary judgment was granted in part and denied in part (Freeman v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:38 am by John Mikhail
”  This statement sounds very much like the interpretive principle underlying one of John Marshall’s most famous remarks in McCulloch v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:56 am by Altman & Altman
As the baby boomer generation enters their senior years, the United States is seeing a surge in senior drivers. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 4:16 am
He was 49 and President of the United States. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 11:54 am by Eugene Kontorovich
Then it concludes: “the Executive Branch determines whether the United States will recognize foreign states and governments and their territorial bounds. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 7:52 am by Paul Stephan
President Truman’s initial decision not to recognize the sovereignty of any state over Jerusalem seems much more clearly within the nexus of attributes covered by recognition than, say, the claims settlement mechanism memorialized in the Litvinov Assignment that United States v. [read post]