Search for: "United States v. Herring"
Results 7081 - 7100
of 23,701
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2019, 8:19 am
United States Postal Service (Supreme Court 2019) [Return Mail, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 8:11 am
In a recent decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled that a lateral job transfer can – in certain circumstances – be an illegal adverse action and support a claim for a lawsuit for unlawful discrimination. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 7:48 am
The Fourth District's recent decision in People v. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 11:04 am
In the employment context, a great example of Justice Ginsburg’s spirited pursuit of equality for all is found in her dissenting opinion in Ledbetter v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 1:54 pm
The first, United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 5:46 am
This judge began his analysis of the motion by noting that to “`“state a claim under § 1983, a plaintiff must allege two essential elements: (1) that a right secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States was violated, and (2) that the alleged violation was committed by a person acting under the color of State law. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 7:26 am
After the defendant arranged for her to obtain a visa and passport, the employee left the Philippines and flew to the United States. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 4:05 am
Bayer, in which Section 43(a) was read to provide a cause of action to a plaintiff whose pleaded trademark had never been used in the United States). [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 12:39 pm
Posted by Greg MersolToday the United States Supreme Court delivered an unexpected present to employers facing FLSA collective actions and held that a defendant may moot such a case by making a Rule 68 offer of judgment to the named plaintiff. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 2:41 am
8thCirc.jpg The Eighth Circuit concludes that FRE 412(a)'s exclusion of evidence of a victim's "sexual behavior" also precludes evidence of a victim's expression of his or her sexual desires or thoughts, in United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 2:40 pm
Patterson in courtroom 24 of the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl St., New York, NY 10007. [read post]
20 May 2009, 3:33 pm
In AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 4:32 am
United States. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 6:13 am
One is the expansion of state standing after Massachusetts v. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 2:03 pm
From Tika v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 9:21 am
Then his case was then taken all the way to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Pasadena. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 2:47 pm
The United States Supreme Court in Batson v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 2:49 pm
United States ended in a result readily understandable to the non-technical observer: the convicted sex offender lost. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:51 am
Photo credit: 3D Quick Link Crossword // ShutterStock * United States v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 10:42 am
The specific test under the ECHR for justifying discrimination in the context of state benefits is set out in Stec v United Kingdom (2006) 43 EHRR 1017, a decision of the Strasbourg Grand Chamber. [read post]
