Search for: "United States v. John"
Results 7081 - 7100
of 11,599
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2013, 12:00 am
Magarian’s comments on today’s decisions follow: The DOMA decision, United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 8:05 pm
United States, 12-862, which asks the Court to overrule Feres v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 7:58 pm
Koontz v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:36 pm
Because the United State Supreme Court just issued its decision in Koontz v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:10 pm
Holder, this Term’s challenge to the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Court held that Section 4 of the law, which identifies the state and local governments that are subject to the Act’s “preclearance” requirement, is unconstitutional based on “current conditions” in the United States. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 2:58 pm
The Supreme Court, in its 5-4 decision today in Shelby v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 5:53 am
"I would urge [the Russians] to live by the standards of the law,” [Secretary of State John] Kerry said. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 6:38 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
Congress responded by prohibiting the transfer or release of Guantánamo detainees to the United States. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:00 am
Jack reflected on the significance of military commissions, particularly in light of some of last week’s events in the United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 6:40 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 11:26 am
The Fifth Circuit adopted the same analysis the United States Supreme Court used in Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 8:12 am
Haugen v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 8:12 am
Haugen v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 4:46 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 10:47 am
United States, Elena Kagan, Guns, Guns / Firearms, HIV / AIDS, John G. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 7:36 am
(Evergreen) appealed from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts dismissing its Second Amended Complaint (complaint). [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 11:59 am
Clapper, the government acknowledged (in a footnote) that the law "confers authority for collecting the contents of wire communications to or from a person in the United States." [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 5:02 am
If you check out Rules 913 and 920 in the Manual for Courts-Martial United States (2012), you will see that the judge gives preliminary instructions to the panel before the court martial actually begins, and then provides “instructions on findings” before the members deliberate on a verdict. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
In Arizona v. [read post]
