Search for: "Able v. United States" Results 7101 - 7120 of 10,830
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2011, 2:55 pm by Tom Lamb
Mensing case was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 23, 2011. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 12:17 pm by Melinda L. McLellan and Jenna N. Felz
Privacy Shield from the Union to self-certified organisations in the United States. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 12:58 pm by NCC Staff
Trump Shouldn’t Be Able to Fire Fauci for Contradicting Him By Peter M. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 4:31 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The majority held in the Dred Scott case that a slave was not a citizen of the United States and therefore did not have the requisite status to be a part of a suit in federal court. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 5:59 pm by Steven Calabresi
Women who really want an abortion will generally be able to cross a state line and get one. [read post]
14 May 2013, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
  An arrest is a “seizure” for Fourth Amendment purposes, but under a case called United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 3:54 pm by Sophia Cope
Additionally, we will be interested to see whether and how the revised policy addresses two key cases that have come down since 2009: the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s 2013 decision in U.S. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 10:02 pm by Ilya Somin
And Article III also gives federal courts jurisdiction over “all controversies to which the United States shall be a party,” controversies between a state and citizens of another state, and controversies between citizens of different states. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 3:56 pm by Stephen Bilkis
With the exception of the United States Constitution's Page 1004 proscription of bills of attainder and ex post facto laws, there is no provision in either the Federal or State Constitutions expressly concerned with retroactive legislation. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 6:30 am by Stephen Griffin
  With the restoration of true majority rule in the Senate, Congress might actually be able to legislate in a way that the Roberts Court would not be able to easily overturn.In trying to forecast the future, Tushnet discusses recent doctrinal “moments” that got a lot of publicity at the time but then seemingly went nowhere. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 11:02 am by Brian E. Barreira
” (emphasis added) As was recently explained by the United States District Court for the District of Idaho in the case of K.W. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 11:02 am by Brian E. Barreira
” (emphasis added) As was recently explained by the United States District Court for the District of Idaho in the case of K.W. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 11:10 am by The Rotolo Law Firm
While UPS employment guidelines state that drivers are required to be able to handle packages up to 70 pounds, the packages handled by Ms. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 4:48 am by SHG
In the intervening years, the Supreme Court has issued some good opinions, such as United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
 After losing before the New Jersey Supreme Court, Princeton appealed to the United States Supreme Court with an absurd argument that their institutional First Amendment rights were violated by requiring that it allow people like my client on campus. [read post]