Search for: "ROBERTS V. UNITED STATES " Results 7101 - 7120 of 9,855
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am by Eugene Volokh
United States, 485 F.2d 1087, 1097 (8th Cir. 1973) (voiding as vague statute punishing "libelous, scurrilous, defamatory words" written on the outside of an envelope"). [read post]
1 Jan 2007, 11:15 pm
Sunday saw the late night release of Justice Roberts report on the state of the Courts. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 2:08 pm by Karen Pita Loor and Cassidy Heverling
The question came to the court in the cases of two men, Jean Francois Pugin and Fernando Cordero-Garcia, both permanent residents of the United States who had lived in the country for decades. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
In the Intercept, Glenn Greenwald draws attention to the fact that Amazon is itself involved in the building of a surveillance state. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 11:18 am by Zack Bluestone
In a symbolic show of force, the United States dispatched “a small armada” to patrol the disputed waters of the South China Sea, according to the Navy Times. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 12:03 pm by John Elwood
Alix notes that the brief the United States filed in the Servotronics case asserted that “whether Section 1782 authorizes assistance for use in investor-state arbitration” was “a question of particular concern to the United States. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 9:56 am
United States (1983), the Supreme Court rejected a university’s claim for a religious exemption from a federal rule that barred race discrimination by tax-exempt organizations. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
[Sophia M.], 179 A.D.3d at 802, quoting People v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 3:19 am by Lisa McElroy
In other big First Amendment news this week, the Court decided United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 9:38 am by Susan C. Morse
Both sides center their arguments on a test set forth in the 2015 case United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 12:48 pm by Amy Howe
Roman Martinez, an assistant to the solicitor general who argued on behalf of the United States, emphasized that parents will choose the fastest option to get relief for their children, which will generally be state administrative proceedings rather than lawsuits in federal court. [read post]