Search for: "State v. Doctor"
Results 7101 - 7120
of 9,599
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2011, 2:39 am
Condliff, R (on the application of) v North Staffordshire Primary Care Trust [2011] EWCA Civ 910 – Read judgment A morbidly obese man has lost his appeal against his local Primary Care Trust’s (PCT’s) refusal to fund his anti-obesity surgery. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 11:37 am
Indeed, Employment Division v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 7:30 am
It upheld the admissibility of the doctor opining “more likely than not”. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 6:31 am
Circuit Court of Appeals gave a pro se (acting as his own attorney) defendant a break in United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 9:39 am
Addendum #2 (8/15/11): Just two weeks after putting up this post, the a Court of Claims judge found for the plaintiff in an attempted suicide case against the State (Acerbo v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 7:52 am
Source: U.S. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 6:38 am
The Court stated that this should be regarded as an upper limit of non-pecuniary loss in catastrophic cases (later, in In Lindal v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 11:10 pm
Jadwin in state court, claiming that the good doctor filed a false claim for $3125 in expenses. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 9:21 pm
In Unruh v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:23 pm
A unit of state government is immune from suit and liability unless the state consents. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 11:17 am
SAYS, United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 8:26 am
Child Injuries v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 4:42 pm
Indeed, Employment Division v. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 7:54 am
Trahan failed to meet that burden, the manifest error standard, as stated in Lewis v. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 5:32 am
For example, in one case, Allstate Insurance Company v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:28 am
” (Dushkin v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 8:50 am
Aguas v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:51 am
On May 9, 1996, Mathews's doctor lifted his medical restrictions, stating that he “should be able to drive or work with machinery. [read post]
ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT ADDRESSES TYPE OF EVIDENCE, STANDARD OF CARE IN PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE CASES
21 Jul 2011, 8:00 am
" Studt, citing Advicula v. [read post]
