Search for: "True v True" Results 7101 - 7120 of 33,957
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2020, 2:44 pm by Patricia Hughes
Slightly over 20 years ago, the Supreme Court of Canada upheld a self-initiated injunction by the Chief Justice of British Columbia to prevent picketing in front of the courthouses in British Columbia; B.C.G.E.U. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 12:02 pm by Will Baude
And that is true even though they were created by Congress. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 5:00 am by Will Baude
And it's true for even more controversial issues, like economic liberty or industrial policy or the unitary executive or whether Erie Railroad v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 10:09 am by Susanna Villani (University of Bologna)
As for the notion of ‘territory’, it was recalled that it may include geographical areas which, although under the jurisdiction or responsibility of a different State, have a separate and distinct status under international law (Court of Justice, Council v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For example, in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
United States The Atlantic had a piece “The True Danger of the Trump Campaign’s Defamation Lawsuits”. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 9:00 am by Dave Maass
To find out if it was true, Leopold filed a request under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), the federal law that allows anyone to demand access to government records. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 9:00 am by Dave Maass
To find out if it was true, Leopold filed a request under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), the federal law that allows anyone to demand access to government records. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 5:41 am by Giles Peaker
City of Westminster v Madhukar Kothari LON/00BK/LBC/2019/0087 Mr Kothari had a right to buy lease of a City of Westminster flat. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 5:18 am
This morning one woke up, hours aftre President Trump declared a national emergency, to news that the House of Representatives (with the encouragement of both President Trump and Speaker Pelosi) passed HR 6201, the “Families First Coronavirus Response Act. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 3:47 am by Eleonora Rosati
 Readers might for instance recall the recent judgment in Sekmadienis Ltd v Lithuania [Katpost here], in which the ECtHR considered that a prohibition to use in advertising the image of Jesus and Mary on grounds of public morals should be regarded as an undue compression of the applicants' own freedom of expression under Article 10 ECHR. [read post]