Search for: "WASHINGTON V. STATE" Results 7101 - 7120 of 17,051
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2011, 6:10 am by Adam Chandler
United States, which was argued in November. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:13 am by Andrew Hamm
At the International Municipal Lawyers Association’s Appellate Practice Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses the State and Local Legal Center’s amicus brief in this Term’s drunk-driving cases, Bernard v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 1:46 pm
Lesley Stedman Weidenbener of the Louisville Courier Journal reports today on a case to be heard Monday, June 16th, at 1:00 PM before the Indiana Supreme Court, State of Indiana v. [read post]
25 Jul 2009, 10:33 pm
Chapter 5.Editor: Generally, the Rule of Specialty limits a court's jurisdiction over a defendant who has been extradited to the United States, based on the terms of the extradition.In the case of State v Figueroa, Washington Court of Appeals, July 6, 2009, the defendant fled from trial and was convicted in abstentia for rape and child molestation. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 8:45 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Restrictions — United States International Trade Commission, Washington, D.C. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 7:03 am
Washington in 2004 is to be applied retroactively in federal habeas cases. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 11:22 am by PaulKostro
One Washington Park Urban Renewal Associates, 154 N.J. 437, 456-57 (1998); see also, Notte v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
KEYNOTE Introduced by Michael Carroll, Professor of Law and Director, Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property, American University Washington College of Law Justin Hughes, Senior Advisor to the Undersecretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property, Head of United States Delegation to the World Intellectual Property Organization, and Professor of Law at Yeshiva University Cardozo School of Law In Geneva, working on GRTKF: Genetic resources, traditional knowledge,… [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 6:27 am by Mark S. Humphreys
 This is pointed out in the 2001, United States Supreme Court opinion styled, Egelhoff v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 7:12 am by Silver Law Group
April, 2018: A customer dispute states “Client upset over the performance of Gemini Fund V $50,000 investment. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 3:00 pm by Lyle Denniston
  In a decision June 26 in Hollingsworth v. [read post]