Search for: "Bui v. State"
Results 7121 - 7140
of 9,830
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2011, 1:46 pm
The government and the state disagreed explicitly on whether a prior Supeme Court ruling, in the 1984 case of South Carolina v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 1:08 pm
The states must have flexibility in their rate-setting methodologies, but they are statutorily required—and should be judicially required—to pay a reasonable price for the services they buy. [read post]
31 May 2011, 8:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 2:41 pm
Thus, these entities may be required to buy produce, meats, or other food products from local producers, to the exclusion of those out of state. [read post]
31 May 2011, 2:36 pm
The case was Macias v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:00 pm
But what if it is said that the salesman induced the customer to buy a damaged car? [read post]
31 May 2011, 9:33 am
Under vouchers, the prison system would come within Zelman v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 9:24 am
States, SE & SW Areas Pension Fund v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 8:00 am
ZS Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 6:11 am
State ex rel. [read post]
30 May 2011, 5:02 am
The district court judge didn’t buy either theory: To state a plausible claim under § 1030, one must be guilty of gaining `unauthorized access’ or `exceeding authorized access’ to a protected computer system. [read post]
30 May 2011, 4:55 am
Mountain States/Rosen L.L.C. [read post]
30 May 2011, 4:00 am
Allied Partners, Littman v. [read post]
29 May 2011, 5:20 pm
Several states have already done this… Hawaii and Arkansas, most recently. [read post]
29 May 2011, 11:14 am
The style of the case is, Unigard Security Insurance Company v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 8:56 am
(3) Did the Ninth Circuit err in holding more generally that a state criminal law which states that no slaughterhouse may buy, sell, receive, process, butcher, or hold a nonambulatory animal is not a preempted attempt to regulate the “premises, facilities, [or] operations” of federally regulated slaughterhouses? [read post]
27 May 2011, 4:30 am
The Seventh Circuit stated that because it resolved the jurisdictional issue in Cunningham Charter Corp. v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:58 pm
ePlus v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 2:02 am
This is the question posed by the IPKat in July of last year, which was also before the Chancery Division England and Wales, in Best Buy Co Inc and another v Worldwide Sales Corporation Espana SL. [read post]
26 May 2011, 1:55 am
Best Buy Co Inc and another v Worldwide Sales Corporation Espa? [read post]
