Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 7121 - 7140
of 13,889
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2009, 1:49 pm
San Francisco, the Court sought the Obama Administration's opinion on whether it should grant cert.; ACSblog covers that development. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 10:55 am
The Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:04 pm
§ § 1395-1395ggg (the "Medicare Act") and the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. [read post]
26 May 2017, 12:22 pm
DOJ’s counsel asserted that the director is not an inferior officer, as was the special prosecutor in Morrison v. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 4:56 pm
The Supreme Court, however, ruled in 2007 in the case of Massachusetts v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 7:57 pm
Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 3:48 am
Although he was paid with funds provided by the City, he was not "paid for by the city" as that term is defined in the Administrative Code of City of NY §13-101[3][a]. [read post]
4 Feb 2025, 1:29 pm
” The executive order also states that the Biden administration’s application of Bostock v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 6:10 am
Article I grants the House the “sole power of impeachment,” and a decision to impeach any civil officer is generally conceded to be unreviewable by the courts. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 6:33 am
See, United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 8:54 am
Hudgens v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 9:03 pm
In the case of National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 11:50 am
In City of Austin v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:37 pm
Tuesday’s Cantero v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 2:24 pm
Supreme Court case, Burwell v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 2:24 pm
Supreme Court case, Burwell v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 2:24 pm
Supreme Court case, Burwell v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 3:24 am
A similar set of events occurred in the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 3:57 pm
Ibrahim v London Borough of Wandsworth [2013] EWCA Civ 20The question for the Court of Appeal in this second appeal from a homeless appeal, was “How should the courts deal with a plainly deficient homelessness decision when the deficiency has had no adverse consequences for the applicant? [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 4:21 am
That’s the position one of the appellate attorneys from the Cuyahoga County prosecutors office found himself in last week during the argument on State v. [read post]
