Search for: "House v. Close" Results 7121 - 7140 of 7,520
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2008, 9:02 pm
This crop of summary orders of interest closes out May 2008.In United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 7:58 am
§ § 170(c), 501(c)(3), especially as those I.R.C. provisions were construed in Bob Jones Univ. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 1:22 am
 A8849A Peoples (MS) -- Establishes the department of corrections shall provide an inmate, upon his or her discharge, with educational information about the prevention of HIV No Same as Last Act: 05/27/08 amend (t) and recommit to correction05/27/08 print number 8849aA11313 Bradley (MS) -- Requires the commissioner of correctional services to enter into agreements to house local inmates to alleviate overcrowding in local correctional facilities Same… [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:55 am
Hildenbrand, No. 07-10210, 07-10211 Defendants' guilty plea convictions for defrauding the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) are affirmed over claims of error regarding the sufficiency of the factual resumes submitted in support of defendants' guilty pleas. [read post]
17 May 2008, 9:53 am
""Who stores numerous paintings … on top of each other throughout the house? [read post]
17 May 2008, 7:48 am
" George left the house and stepped into the waiting limousine, a twenty foor foot white stretched monster with blacked out windows. [read post]
16 May 2008, 11:57 am
In a case that is being closely watched in the multi-family housing industry, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals this week released its opinion affirming the lower court's holding that the 2-year statute of limitations for a private civil action alleging violation of the Fair Housing Act's accessibility requirements for design and construction is triggered, i.e., the violation is complete, at the conclusion of the design and construction phase, which occurs on… [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Iodice, No. 06-2680 Defendant's conviction of various counts related to three arsons and the robbery of a money courier are affirmed over his claims that: 1) the federal arson statute is unconstitutional as applied to the arson of a closed diner; 2) the district court erred in crediting a special agent's account of the arrest; and 3) he received constitutionally ineffective assistance of counsel. [read post]
8 May 2008, 4:23 pm
They are basically using the same argument under which a right to privacy was found under Roe v. [read post]