Search for: "In v. United States" Results 7121 - 7140 of 102,839
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2022, 2:37 pm by LawGina
  The guidelines are intended to ensure more consistent treatment for student loan discharges and to facilitate an easier fact gathering process for the United States Attorney’s office and the Department of Justice. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 2:37 pm by LawGina
  The guidelines are intended to ensure more consistent treatment for student loan discharges and to facilitate an easier fact gathering process for the United States Attorney’s office and the Department of Justice. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 12:04 pm by Richard Frank
 That’s true for two related reasons: first, the sprawling Ninth Circuit encompasses nine different states (including California) and several territories in the Western United States that together generate considerable environmental litigation. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 9:44 am by Peter Howard Tilem
Moran, of the Rochester based Monroe County Supreme Court struck down these laws in a 10 page decision, in a case entitled G.W. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
  JUNE The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, overturned Roe v. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 1:41 pm by Kory A. Crichton
’s due process rights under the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Series of Essays
Jackson Women’s Health, and New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 2:45 pm by Lawrence Solum
In response to this conundrum, American courts have oscillated between two judicial postures that the United States Supreme Court has found to be constitutionally permissible: (1) the “compulsory deference” method preferred in the 1871 case Watson v. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 12:21 pm by Carabin Shaw
Searching a vehicle without a warrant (December 28, 2022) The United States Supreme Court case Mapp v. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 5:05 am by Michael C. Dorf
Meanwhile, although it opposed what it likely saw as officious intermeddling by the state plaintiffs in Arizona v. [read post]