Search for: "John Doe Companies " Results 7121 - 7140 of 10,768
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2012, 4:56 pm by Employment Lawyers
This Post does not focus on PCHR, instead dealing with PHRC and EEOC only. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 4:56 pm by Employment Lawyers
This Post does not focus on PCHR, instead dealing with PHRC and EEOC only. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 3:13 pm by Jennifer Smith
” Patton Boggs works closely with BlackRobe Capital but does not have a current retainer agreement with the company. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 8:15 am by Stikeman Elliott LLP
We expect to see more re-leveraging of portfolio companies in 2012 to permit these sponsors to effect liquidity and sell their equity. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:58 am by Kevin LaCroix
Back in February 2007, when investors in New Century Financial Corporation filed a securities class action lawsuit against the company and certain of its directors and officers, there was little reason to suspect at the time that problems at the company represented the leading edge of a looming financial crisis or that the case itself was the first lawsuit in what ultimately grew to become a mountain of subprime and credit crisis-related litigation. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 10:39 pm by Lara
  The company is selling a doll kit that retails for US $99.99 exclusive of shipping (does that mean you will own, but not possess it?). [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
The Guardian’s Lisa O’Carroll quipped on Twitter: “Now Mail have published pap shots of Rebekah Brooks, does this mean Sun retaliates with pap pix of [Paul] Dacre in Caribbean? [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 6:16 pm by Sunni Yuen
The Ninth Circuit has held that a stricter test for unmasking “John Doe” Internet publishers is appropriate when the speech at issue is non-commercial. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 4:58 am by Jon Hyman
– from Wage & Hour Insights Lady Gaga’s Personal Assistant Sues for Overtime: “At Her Side” 24/7 – from Wage and Hour Law Update Get a Fresh Start on Misclassification in 2012 – from Stephanie Thomas at Compensation Cafe Can my company force me to take health insurance? [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 4:02 am by Broc Romanek
The specific position taken by the staff does not appear to have been previously publicly reported. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Since John v MGN Ltd [1997] QB 586 general damages in libel have been limited to a ceiling at that date of £200,000, following a comparison with personal injury damages. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
   Representing broadcasting companies will be Carter G. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 11:54 am
It is may also be unnecessary, as UPS and other companies have fleets of vehicles powered by natural gas without the NAT GAS Act. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 11:54 am
It is may also be unnecessary, as UPS and other companies have fleets of vehicles powered by natural gas without the NAT GAS Act. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 10:32 am by Charley Moore
John Biggs uncovers the central legal issue concerning Twitter: Can a company cash in on, and claim ownership of, an employee’s social media account, and if so, what does that mean for workers who are increasingly posting to Twitter, Facebook and Google Plus during work hours? [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 6:27 pm by Harry
For example, if one party is a large company perceived as a “deep pocket” to pay damages from lawsuits, and the other party is small company that could cause harm but has no assets to pay damages, then the large company may require the small company to obtain insurance to protect against the small company’s harmful actions, and to add the large company as an “additional insured” to the small company’s… [read post]