Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 7121 - 7140
of 178,486
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2016, 9:53 am
., June 15, 2016), the Court granted plaintiff Unwired Planet, Inc. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 8:54 am
Following a jury trial and advisory jury verdict, the court found that laches did not apply even though plaintiff's patent counsel destroyed his prosecution files during plaintiff's delay of six years plus a few weeks. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 8:13 am
In denying plaintiff's motion to reconsider a stay pending reexamination, the court rejected plaintiff's argument that its experts "will be prejudiced by virtue of the stay because they have agreed to a patent prosecution bar until one year after resolution of the case. . . . [read post]
12 May 2010, 5:30 am
The plaintiffs, seeking to represent a class of GMAC’s Georgia customers, brought an action against GMAC Mortgage, LLC and GMAC, Inc (collectively, “GMAC”) in the superior Court of Muscogee County, alleging that their home loans were serviced by GMAC, and that all the late fees that GMAC charged them were improper and excessive. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
But ultimately, when a personal injury case was later filed, the institution only provided about 12 seconds of tape and failed to explain with happened to the balance.After JW made a motion to strike the hospital’s answer due to its “spoliation of evidence,” the New York County Supreme Court ended up siding with JW, and an appeal ensued.Since the camera recordings were “crucial” to establishing “the origin of the substance plaintiff allegedly… [read post]
6 Apr 2013, 3:03 pm
Moreover, “Plaintiff’s sur-reply is relatively short, challenges Defendant’s interpretation and application of [the Eighth Circuit case], and explains Plaintiff’s view of the newly presented evidence. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
In addition, the Plaintiff contends that Noah’s Domain Name is similar to Plaintiff’s TILT STUDIO and TILTED 10 marks, which could potentially cause confusion among the customer base who may assume an affiliation between the two entities. [read post]
22 May 2024, 5:00 am
” While a request for a stay was previously granted, on May 6, 2022, when the defendant again moved for the identical relief, claiming that the plaintiff’s prior attorney was involved in a “proven insurance fraud scheme involving staged trip and fall accidents,” that request was denied.When the dispute got to the Appellate Division, Second Department, it noted that the parties referenced arguments and exhibits that were supposedly attached to, or… [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 11:12 am
In Maryland medical malpractice cases, a plaintiff must show that the defendant’s negligence caused the plaintiff’s harm. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 8:16 am
After reviewing and finding “confusion in the record” about the similarity of the plaintiff’s plans and the plans he allegedly copied, the Court “concludes that there are genuine issues of material fact concerning the originality, and thus the validity, of Plaintiff’s copyrights, precluding a grant of partial summary judgment on Plaintiff’s claims of copyright infringement. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:49 pm
The Second Department determined that plaintiff’s testimony, namely that he could not recall how many ladders were in the room at the time of his accident and that he did not know whether there were more than six ladders available at the job site, failed to eliminate all triable issues of fact as to whether there were ladders available and whether plaintiff’s decision to stand on the bucket was the sole proximate cause of his injuries. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:49 pm
The Second Department determined that plaintiff’s testimony, namely that he could not recall how many ladders were in the room at the time of his accident and that he did not know whether there were more than six ladders available at the job site, failed to eliminate all triable issues of fact as to whether there were ladders available and whether plaintiff’s decision to stand on the bucket was the sole proximate cause of his injuries. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 7:12 am
A vendor mistakenly granted Uber Technologies access to plaintiff’s account, resulting in plaintiff’s temporary inability to access its own account and giving Uber Technologies access to plaintiff’s business information. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 6:05 am
Government investigations are chilling plaintiff's attorneys. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 7:01 am
Medical experts really should not be testifying as to the plaintiff's credibility. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 3:55 pm
That's the general rule, although we have seen some inconsistent decisions in this area. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 8:25 am
The Court's order underscored the importance of the meet and confer obligation in the local rules, however, noting that "[a]s a part of the sanction, the undersigned also considered awarding the plaintiff all attorneys fees and costs incurred in presenting the motion to compel and defending against the motion for protection. [read post]
20 May 2014, 5:37 am
Plaintiff alleged that CVS used an automatic telephonic dialing system (“ATDS”) to call plaintiff’s cell phone without plaintiff’s consent. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 5:00 am
Luke’s Univ. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 3:55 pm
As such, the defendants' claimed request in the motion to seal is to preserve the plaintiffs' minor son's anonymity. [read post]
