Search for: "State v. Doctor" Results 7121 - 7140 of 9,599
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2011, 3:31 am
That is, it may certainly decide not to pay doctors the same reimbursement rates under Medicare in 2012 as it did in 2011. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 8:05 am by emagraken
 In opposing the application the Plaintiff produced evidence from her doctor stating that “she is unable to travel….at the present time or in the forseeable future“. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:06 am by Max Kennerly
Every state conducts itself in an entirely different manner, and within states the law is changed to suit the circumstances. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 9:20 am by Bexis
- New EDPA case requiring unsuccessful plaintiff to pay as costs  part of cost of complying with its ediscovery demands - Link.June 16, 2011:  It Should Be An Interesting Couple Of Weeks - Analysis of new Supreme Court Smith v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:53 am by Ken Kersch
Indeed, he alleged that Madison had doctored his notes from the constitutional convention as part of a deliberate plan to foist a fraudulent Jeffersonian constitutionalism upon an unsuspecting nation. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:02 am by GuestPost
Furthermore, the GRAG draws support for the ECHR decision of Parry v UK to argue that it is within the margin of appreciation afforded to states on this issue to exclude married applicants from recognition. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 7:21 pm by Dwight Sullivan
The controversy calls to mind last term’s CAAF decision in United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 12:56 pm by Frank Pasquale
But doctors and researchers should insulate professional expertise and the interpretation of maladies as much as possible from inappropriate pressures. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:32 am by Hanibal Goitom
" (Tenteah v Republic of Liberia (1940) 7 LLR 63). [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 6:59 am by randal shaheen
  The forthcoming expedited appeal can be expected to shed light on a plaintiff’s burden to show irreparable harm for preliminary injunctions in the wake of the 2008 Supreme Court’s decision in Winter v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 8:02 pm
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 427 F.3d 446 (2005) that federal courts retained jurisdiction because the TCPA's provision authorizing private actions in state court did not declare state jurisdiction to be exclusive.The petition for review is Mims v. [read post]