Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 7121 - 7140
of 19,251
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2017, 9:46 am
See United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 10:14 am
Twenty years ago, in Bernstein v. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 11:27 am
Knighthead Master Fund, L.P. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 4:10 am
Prasco v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 3:22 pm
Alaska Oil and Gas Ass’n v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:07 pm
Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 7:25 am
AFL Telecommunications LLC v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:47 pm
This morning brought decisions in both of the patent cases argued in November, with the government prevailing on the constitutional question raised in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am
Indeed, Griffin’s Case was about a state office, and the Court in Trump v. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 3:09 pm
The Decision in Gregg v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:34 pm
The case is the Matter of Mark Dewine v. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 7:12 am
Here they are in case you missed them:TRADE MARKSKatfriend Marijus Dingilevskis posted on a recent decision of the Lithuanian Supreme Court, which states that even if a trade mark has been registered in the international register for 40 years, this is no guarantee that a subsequent national designation will be also registered.GuestKat Becky Knott commented on the decision of the 2nd Board of Appeal in case R 609/2021-2 [Volkswagen… [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 2:31 am
Chutter, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 8:22 am
Zamfir v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 9:15 am
CFE Racing Products, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 11:19 am
It appears that Merck KGaA (MK) alleged that MSD had infringed its trade mark in the United Kingdom and, while it's not stated explicitly in the note received by this Kat, it looks as though there had been use of the mark but that MSD was arguing that it was a use that was permitted under the terms of the agreement, since MSD was arguing here that the agreement was governed by New Jersey law. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 2:09 am
Member States shall provide for authors, in respect of the original of their works or of copies thereof, the exclusive right to authorise or prohibit any form of distribution to the public by sale or otherwise. 2. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 2:57 am
In re Cordua Rests., 118 USPQ2d at 1638 cited in Royal Crown v. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 9:30 am
States Have Sovereign Immunity from Copyright Damages | [Guest post] ‘Upload filters’ and human rights: implementing Article 17 of the Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market | Stairway to Heaven: The impact of Zeppelin on Katy Perry's copyright infringement case - overturned | China says ‘No’ to the malicious filing of Coronavirus-related trade marks | Does the requirement for a "technical contribution" in a… [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 7:59 am
Parks, LLC v. [read post]
