Search for: "Unit, Inc., Appeal of"
Results 7121 - 7140
of 13,897
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2014, 8:02 am
The District Court had ruled that AF could subpoena Internet service providers including Verizon Communications Inc. and Comcast Corp for identify information on subscribers whose computers were linked to downloads of the movie via the BitTorrent file-sharing protocol. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:49 pm
Procedural HistoryK/S HIMPP (“HIMPP”) appeals from the decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (“Board”) in an inter partes reexamination affirming the Central Reexamination Unit (“CRU”) Examiner’s decision not to reject claims 3 and 9 of U.S. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:45 pm
Cisco Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 3:27 am
No. 11-1391 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit No. 2:10-cv-10137—Gerald E. [read post]
23 May 2014, 2:26 pm
Mills, Inc., v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 2:00 pm
The trial court vacated the award, but the court of appeals reversed on the ground that the initial disclosure was enough to put Tenaska on notice to investigate. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am
One-time relist Pitcairn Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 3:58 am
The District Court agreed, then the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed. [read post]
22 May 2014, 2:11 pm
Icon Health & Fitness Inc. and Highmark Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 10:51 am
May 14, 2014), the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed a district court’s exclusion of an event study as unreliable under Daubert v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 8:42 am
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan at Marquette. [read post]
22 May 2014, 8:40 am
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan at Marquette. [read post]
22 May 2014, 5:00 am
Pfizer, Inc., 2000 WL 1099884, at *2 & n.1 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
21 May 2014, 8:42 pm
Klein Tools, Inc., 949 F.2d 1047, 1048 (8th Cir. 1991) and Pfizer Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 10:02 am
Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U. [read post]
21 May 2014, 6:35 am
Crockett promptly appealed the court’s decision to the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
20 May 2014, 11:04 am
In reaching its conclusion, the Court declined to follow unpublished decisions from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (which includes California) and the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (within the Third Circuit), which had previously held that the notification made pursuant to the TILA automatically voided a security interest. [read post]
19 May 2014, 7:45 pm
United States 13-983Issue: Whether, consistent with the First Amendment and Virginia v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 2:12 pm
” The previously-mentioned school districts appealed the ruling to the U.S. [read post]
16 May 2014, 7:37 am
Tran andReal Action Paintball, Inc., a California corporation (collectively "RAP4"), argued before the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit that the trademark infringement suit brought in the Northern District of Indiana by Advanced Tactical Ordnance Systems, LLC, an Indiana corporation ("ATO"), was not properly before the Indiana court, as it lacked personal jurisdiction over RAP4. [read post]
