Search for: "United States v. AT&T, Inc."
Results 7121 - 7140
of 8,841
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(Afro-IP) Spain Trade mark cancellation and damages: a matter of (bad) faith (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC (Pat): No ruling on hypothetical issue: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (PatLit) EWHC: Trial judge says ‘Boileau’ to patent licence; appeal court agrees: Oxonica Energy Ltd v… [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 1:00 am
(Korea IP Law Blog), Korean trade mark law governs domain name disputes in Korea (Korea IP Law Blog), SpainLipitor patent upheld in Spain: (IPLaw 360), United Kingdom House of Lords overturns the Court of Appeal in the Yeda Appeal over Erbitux: (IPKat), (Inner Temple), (IP Law360), Novartis AG v IVAX Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 971, Court of Appeal dismisses an appeal against the decision of Mr Justice Pumfrey that Novartis' patent for a pharmaceutical… [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 8:41 am
Supreme subsequently reversed, see CSX Transportation, Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 3:00 am
LabMD, Inc. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 5:40 am
, 466 US 485 (1984); and United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 10:21 pm
William Downey, Managing Director at W J Downey & Associates and graduate (cum laude) from the Saint Georges School of Law (1996), said, In Antigua v United States, the World Trade Organization (WTO) said the United States could restrict online gambling on sporting events, but could not prohibit offshore companies from offering online betting on horse racing. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
” In March 1783, the US Continental Congress appointed a committee to “consider the most proper means of cherishing genius and useful arts through the United States by securing to authors or publishers of new books their property in such works. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 7:07 am
See EEOC v Shoney’s, Inc., 536 F. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 4:29 pm
” Cryptography Research, Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 8:45 am
But see United We Stand Am., Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 11:33 am
” That is, the Board must consider “the implication of a rule that would permit a union to harass an employer by repeated and burdensome requests for irrelevant information only because it can be said it somehow relates to bargaining unit employees—without even a union’s statement of its need” (IronTiger Logistics, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:01 pm
Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc., 285 F.3d 238, 239 n.2 (3d Cir. 2002) (applying Pennsylvania law) (Bexis’s case); Bogle v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:10 am
” Amchem Products, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 11:45 am
Your card statement will list a credit card or debit card payment as “United States Treasury Tax Payment. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 5:53 pm
To pay what you owe, make your check or money order payable to “United States Treasury” for the full amount due. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 9:30 am
" But c'mon...you can't blame anyone. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 12:18 pm
Organovo Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 9:16 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 4:24 am
FEIT AND LAUREN T. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:16 am
Desmarais is also registered to practice before the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
