Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office" Results 7141 - 7160 of 13,889
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2017, 4:27 am by Edith Roberts
At Constitution Daily, Scott Bomboy looks for other examples of “the nomination of a new Justice mid-term as a new President takes office,” noting that to “find a similar scenario where a President from a party differing from his predecessor made a Supreme Court nomination right off the bat, we had to go back to 1853 and the new administration of Franklin Pierce. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At the Florida Court Review, John Cavaliere looks at the cert petition in Truehill v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 4:00 am by Alan E. Sherman
According to the State Office of Administrative Hearings (SOAH) Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) in consolidated Hearing Nos. 101,531 and 101,532, the jewelry retailer, or the “Claimant” in that proceeding, …entered an agreement with ************** (COMPANY A) that allowed Claimant to offer private label credit cards to its customers. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 11:35 am
The prosecutor's office withdrew from the case and the court appointed the attorney general to serve as a special prosecutor. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 1:14 pm by John Ross
District Court: Actually, TSA agents are not law enforcement officers because they do not execute searches because searches can only be executed by law enforcement officers. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 6:05 am by Gene Quinn
Conceptually there are many strategic and tactical issues that are of general applicability to both the litigation and administrative trial." [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm by Andrew Hamm
  Administrative Law Gutierrez-Brizuela v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 11:03 pm by Andrew Langille
I rarely write case comments, but thought that it was warranted for the recent superior court decision in Silvera v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 6:29 pm by Dennis Crouch
Agency to Appellate Court: Article III limitations do not directly apply to IPR proceedings themselves because the PTAB is an Article I administrative adjudicator rather than an Article III court. [read post]