Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 7141 - 7160
of 15,523
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2015, 4:07 pm
In the case of Aitken v DPP ([2015] EWHC 1079 (Admin)) the Divisional Court dismissed a former editor’s appeal against a conviction for publishing a story which breached an anonymity order under section 39 of the Children and Young Persons Act 1933. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:42 am
We can’t really figure out what the Supreme Court is telling us in Young v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 3:25 pm
Clark v Manchester City Council [2015] UKUT 129 (LC) Mr Clark had a licence for an HMO for not more than 5 occupants. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 8:12 am
It’s really hard to figure out what to make of this conclusion. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 4:03 am
Presenters often appear to be ill-briefed and insufficiently armed with the facts necessary to challenge assertions made by interviewees in live interviews, reflecting not just pressure on them but a lack of understanding by programme researchers and producers He also pointed to ‘evidence of a misunderstanding of the political process in the EU’, drawing attention in particular to written evidence submitted by the Labour Party which stated that ‘too often it seems that you report… [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 3:01 pm
Case Citation: Sweet v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:29 am
We figured we’d at least get some recognition for our poetry submissions, if not for explanatory reporting, public service, or even our editorial cartooning (what is with that pinkie, anyway?). [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:17 am
Salinas v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
Like Mike, we think third-party burdens ought to figure prominently in any application of state RFRAs. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 9:10 am
In Beatty v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 8:11 am
In Rams Gate Winery, LLC v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 7:08 am
She said, “The trial was called the United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 7:07 am
Tuesday’s argument in McFadden v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 5:41 pm
Today, though, in Horne v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:52 pm
It is tailor-made to ensure that public figures do not have to be worried about New York Times v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 3:53 pm
It is tailor-made to ensure that public figures do not have to be worried about New York Times v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 11:24 am
” And we need to figure out what caused the epiphany. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
The Supreme Court of Canada decided in 2013 that a judge could largely copy from the parties’ submissions in his reasons: Cojocaru v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
” That opinion, Bowers v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 5:23 pm
The complaint (Download Quicken Loans v. [read post]
