Search for: "Levell v. State"
Results 7141 - 7160
of 29,839
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2019, 5:54 am
Whether a situation rises to the level of an exigent circumstance is a fact-driven question but typically requires the need for immediate action to prevent harm. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am
The first two cases, Bostock v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 3:05 am
” VC Slights cited the Delaware Supreme Court’s recent decision in Marchand v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:05 pm
” In September, the parties in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
Harris Funeral Homes v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 8:16 pm
Zarda / Bostock v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 5:43 pm
Nor did the potential loss of key-holder or full-time status rise to the level of an adverse employment action, since the store manager only stated that the employee’s role would change if she did not qualify for leave and continued to miss work. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 2:37 pm
Earlier this year, in Marchand v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 1:24 pm
The new law codifies and expands on a 2018 California Supreme Court decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:12 am
Kennedy’s swing vote resulted in a few liberal outcomes (notably on same-sex marriage), but Roberts defected from the conservative position only when it came to the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which he famously voted to uphold in NFIB v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 8:51 am
Yet the SALT deduction the blue states seek to restore to its former level does exactly that. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:58 pm
The Court then used the factors from R. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:48 am
We should add some context before we move on.The Court of Customs and Patent Appeals faced a similar question in United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:02 am
This means that it was null and of no effect: see, if authority were needed, R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51, para 119. [read post]
5 Oct 2019, 7:07 pm
Up State Tower Co., LLC v. [read post]
5 Oct 2019, 1:01 pm
Although a state attorney general’s office has argued two cases in a given year – last term, Alaska argued Sturgeon v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 1:32 pm
She required a “secret level” security clearance for her work. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 1:28 pm
O’Bannon v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 12:34 pm
Circuit: And here are three opinions spanning 186 pages explaining why that's allowed and what it means for similar efforts at the state level. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 6:44 am
United States, issued on September 17. [read post]
