Search for: "R. G." Results 7141 - 7160 of 22,655
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2015, 10:14 am by Olivier Moréteau
L'existence d'un arbitrage religieux.Le concept même d'arbitrage religieux se heurte à une importante difficulté de définition : faut-ilconsidérer comme un arbitrage religieux, tout arbitrage dans lequel le droit appliqué par les arbitresest un droit religieux, ou plus généralement tout arbitrage qui fait appel à des règles religieuses ? [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 9:05 am
’ A critical constructivist view of the Responsibility to Protect Pinar Gözen Ercan, Responsibility to protect and inter-state crises: why and how R2P applies to the case of Gaza Sonja Grover, R2P and the Syrian crisis: when semantics becomes a matter of life or death Aidan Hehir, Bahrain: an R2P blind spot? [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 2:37 am by Robert A. Epstein
.'”  It then cited to subsection (j)(1) of the amended law, which provides that alimony could only continue if ex-wife presented proof to overcome the rebuttable presumption based upon the following factors: (a) the ages of the parties at the time of the application for retirement; (b) The ages of the parties at the time of the marriage or civil union and their ages at the time of entry of the alimony award; (c) The degree and duration of the economic dependency of the recipient upon… [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 2:37 am by Robert A. Epstein
.'”  It then cited to subsection (j)(1) of the amended law, which provides that alimony could only continue if ex-wife presented proof to overcome the rebuttable presumption based upon the following factors: (a) the ages of the parties at the time of the application for retirement; (b) The ages of the parties at the time of the marriage or civil union and their ages at the time of entry of the alimony award; (c) The degree and duration of the economic dependency of the recipient upon… [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 2:03 pm by Giles Peaker
The issues were: (i) whether the offer had been valid under Pt 36 when it had not strictly complied with r.36.2(2)(c); (ii) whether the judge had been wrong to make the costs order; (iii) the appropriate cost order under r.44.2 if Pt 36 did not apply. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 10:08 am by Thompson & Knight LLP
The Debtor’s indebtedness includes approximately $37 million owed an account of a revolving credit facility with Société Générale as Administrative Agent and lead lender plus certain lenders identified therein. [read post]
§1970(g) – Certain insurance payouts to Veterans exempt from taxation, creditors, or other legal seizure. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 3:11 am
Contents include:Special Issue: The United Nations at 70Thomas G. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 1:34 am
Katfriend and IP enthusiast Nedim Malovic (Stockholm University) explains how this case went.* President pauses processing of potentially poisonous prioritiesThe issue of poisonous priorities (and poisonous divisionals) is the subject of a referral to the European Patent Office (EPO) Enlarged Board of Appeal which is pending under reference G 1/15 [for those readers who are wondering how a priority can be poisonous, take a look at the IPKat here]. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 2:40 pm by D. Daxton White
According to the SEC press release, “Brokers serve important gatekeeping functions in our markets and deterring market manipulation is among their critical responsibilities,” said Joseph G. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 11:42 am by Lax & Neville LLP
On November 4, 2015, the Securities and Exchange Committee (“SEC”) filed an Order, pursuant to Rules 21F-10(g) and (h), 17 C.F.R. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 9:18 am by Padraic F.X. Dugan, Esq.
., supra, ––– N.J. at –––– (slip op. at 18) (quoting In re Dany G., ––– A.3d ––––, –––– (Md.Ct.Spec.App.2015)).] [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 7:50 am by Robert Schaffer
The Federal Circuit reversed the district court’s claim construction, and held that the claim language does not require that the start and duration of remote-transmission intervals be communicated prior to the beginning of the cycle. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 7:29 am by Renwei Chung
Law firms and in-house groups have failed to diversify their workforce, despite strong efforts and best intentions [read post]