Search for: "State v. Holder" Results 7141 - 7160 of 8,253
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2010, 4:16 pm by Lawrence Cunningham
In particular, the Commission noted that in the three fully litigated cases in which security holders had attacked such fees under state law, the courts had relied on the approval of adviser contracts by security holders or unaffiliated directors to uphold the fees. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 11:17 am by Kevin Poulsen and Kim Zetter
Gonzalez :3/17/2008 7:25:53 PM i stopped bruting the domain admin pw Gonzalez: 3/17/2008 7:26:01 PM after [hacker 2] got domain admin i stopped Source: Government court filing in U.S. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:00 am by Kevin
Holder, 571 F.3d 524, 525 (6th Cir. 2009) (au contraire); Malta-Espinoza v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 7:10 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This is stated in the 2000 Texas Supreme Court case, Crown Life Insurance Company v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
We did a lengthy discussion of the Chancery Court's recent opinion in Kurz v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 1:26 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKContractsBreach, Veil Pierce, Claims Survive in Account Holders' Suit Over Improperly Executed PurchaseTrabucco v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 4:08 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  In particular, the ALJ stated that Toyota’s reliance on Young Engineers, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 1:18 pm by Witzke Berry PLLC
A certain amount of caution on the part of financial institutions is understandable: When someone steps forward claiming to represent the account holder, the financial institution wants to verify that the attorney-in-fact indeed has the authority to act for the principal. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 5:00 am by Erin Miller
United States (09-6338) — authority of federal judges, in setting a new prison sentence, to go below Guideline range Barber v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 8:11 am by R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
This is an important case for those of you who recently purchased a car to use in your business, BUT now find yourself needing to file bankruptcy.IN RE DENNIS & JESSICA HASKINSIn re: Dennis & Jessica Haskins, Chapter 13, Debtors.Case No. 09-10520.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 10:06 pm
Ironically, that rule comes, in part, from the Michigan Supreme Court's decision in the case of People v Cress (yet another Battle Creek area murder case). [read post]