Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 7141 - 7160
of 8,253
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2015, 11:27 am
” Sony Corp. of Am. v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 10:00 am
In Title 17 of the United States Code, Congress expressly conferred to copyright holders – composers, songwriters, lyricists, and publishers – the exclusive right to perform or authorize the performance of their works publicly. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 5:52 am
Regulation 469/2009 ... recognises amongst the other purposes identified in the recitals, the need for the grant of an SPC by each of the Member States of the Community to holders of national or European patents to be under the same conditions, as indicated in recitals 7 and 8. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 2:58 pm
Circuit’s March 2, 2010 decision in Teva Pharms USA, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 2:10 am
Readers may recall this tactic was tried last year in the case of Sigram Schindler Beteilungsgesellschaft mbH v. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 4:53 pm
In April, Judge Neil V. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 6:00 am
Pre-Retirement Death Benefits In Cotnam v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 10:40 am
Sharing passwords isn’t circumvention (at least when the copyright holder doesn’t clearly state that sharing passwords is a problem).And even if it was, people who circumvent technological protection measures don’t violate the Copyright Act if they stick to fair dealing once they’ve done their circumventing.That’s all for today. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 12:50 pm
The RIAA is winding down its lawsuit campaign and instead is working with other rights holders and internet service providers to adopt a program to discontinue internet access of online copyright scofflaws. [read post]
16 May 2010, 4:28 pm
This reminds us that, whatever the status of the “right to internet access” it is a right which still needs to be balanced against other rights – for example the right of copyright holders to protect and exploit the products of their work. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
” Following the Supreme Court’s Burwell v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 6:56 am
” In Johnson v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 3:48 am
Case in point: Brooklyn Commercial Division Justice Lawrence Knipel’s recent decision in Matter of Lev v Rosenberg, 2019 NY Slip Op 30824(U) [Sup Ct Kings County Mar. 13, 2019]. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 12:38 pm
Copyright holders also hold “moral rights” in such works which protect the author’s association with a creative work and allow the author to preserve its integrity and intent, though such rights, unlike copyright, can only be waived and are not assignable. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 11:00 pm
In the not-so-distant past (before 2008’s “Egyptian Goddess” decision) (Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 4:51 pm
Holder (docket 08-681), was not turned up by the government. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 8:46 pm
Gardner v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 5:00 pm
The case, Kaplan v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:39 pm
In this case that is emphatically not the case, since 10 million claims were filed (I’m not clear, though, if it was 10 million people, or if there may have been multiple claims by holders of multiple cards). [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 1:51 pm
In Office Depot, Inc. v. [read post]
