Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court" Results 7161 - 7180 of 9,063
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2010, 6:04 am by lawmrh
The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline for the Ohio Supreme Court, for instance, has determined that quoting clients on a law firm’s website violates the prohibition against client testimonials under ABA Model Rule 7.1. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 10:27 am by Dan Gauss
Supreme Court failed to strike down the “show me your papers” provision of the Arizona law. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:18 pm by Sarnata Reynolds
These bills throw more money at detention centers and enforcement operations and ups the ante by making their imprisonment mandatory and indefinite, regardless of Supreme Court precedent finding that it’s unconstitutional. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 11:35 am by Gregory Ablavsky
Stanford Law Associate Professor Gregory AblavskyThis outcome is surprising only if you assume that Native nations won’t win in the Supreme Court when the decision will have significant practical consequences, or that it’s unexpected that the Court will recognize (limited) Native jurisdiction over non-Natives. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 4:28 am by Amanda Frost
(A successful suit had recently been brought against Arizona after it had barred other recipients of deferred action from obtaining driver’s licenses in that state.) [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
The McCabe Curwood website has a comment on the recent decision of the Supreme Court of Victoria in the case of Defteros v Google LLC Canada CBC News had a piece “Constituents sue George Darouze for defamation”. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:40 am by totmauthor
State Bar of Arizona, the Court held that Arizona’s ban on lawyer advertising violated the First Amendment. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 3:04 pm by Brian Tamanaha
Clear signs of the resurrection of judicial recall fever are evident in last week's elections—most obviously in the unseating of three Iowa Supreme Court Justices who declared a right to same-sex marriage. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 2:58 pm by Elie Mystal
The court finds that that case was irrelevant because the Arizona statute did not mirror the California statute. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 6:59 am by Jeff Gamso
  Yesterday the Ohio Texas Alabama Arizona Alaska US Arkansas Supreme Court ruled.The proper test, they said (lawyers will guess, the rest of you can just shake your heads) is not whether the lower court was right in deciding against ordering the DNA tested. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 3:39 am by Jeff Welty
Alabama retroactivity headed to the Supreme Court, again. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 10:57 am by Kent Scheidegger
The Obama Administration failed to seek Supreme Court review of this decision. [read post]
23 May 2009, 12:12 am
The brief asserts that the Supreme Court should intervene "because Mr. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 6:10 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
On 3 September 2013 the Oklahoma Supreme Court took up the case, granting a temporary stay of an enforcement order and allowing the father to keep Veronica pending further proceedings. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 4:00 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
Ultimately, Arizona’s Supreme Court agreed with lower courts that the legislature acted outside its boundaries. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 11:16 am by Epstein Becker Green
  However, the Colorado Supreme Court granted review of the case recently, so Colorado employers should monitor this case closely. [read post]
20 May 2022, 5:58 am by Nicholas Espíritu
The first is a leaked Supreme Court draft opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]