Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court" Results 7161 - 7180 of 9,063
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2010, 6:10 am by Ashby Jones
In the last five years or so, the Supreme Court has jumped more aggressively than ever before into the once-arcane world of patent law. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 11:55 am by Rick.Hasen@lls.edu
Supreme Court agreed to hear the Institute for Justice's challenge to Arizona's "Clean Elections" Act. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 10:48 am
" And James Vicini of Reuters reports that "Supreme Court to decide Arizona campaign finance law. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 10:07 am by Joe Consumer
Supreme Court won't hesitate to reverse its own precedent to benefit corporations. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 10:07 am by Joe Consumer
Supreme Court won't hesitate to reverse its own precedent to benefit corporations. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 9:09 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Monday granted certiorari [order list, PDF] in four cases, consolidating two cases concerning campaign financing [JURIST news archive]. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 8:11 am by Rick.Hasen@lls.edu
As I expected, the Supreme Court has granted cert in the McComish v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:07 am by Lyle Denniston
The Supreme Court on Monday moved into the center of a spreading legal controversy over public subsidies for political candidates, granting review of a pair of cases involving Arizona’s so-called “clean elections” law. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 6:03 am by Juggalo Law
[New York Times]* Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will hear arguments on whether California’s prisons are unconstitutionally overcrowded. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 2:10 pm by Michael Dery
In a previous post, we wrote about an Ontario judge’s decision to not enforce a forum selection clause in an aircraft engine lease agreement, which stated that disputes related to the agreement were to be decided according to Arizona law and resolved by the courts in Arizona. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 10:12 am by Larry Bodine
The Supreme Court already gave us the answer in 1977 -- lawyer advertising is allowed. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 10:12 am by Larry Bodine
The Supreme Court already gave us the answer in 1977 -- lawyer advertising is allowed. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 7:23 am by Adam Chandler
” Kent Scheidegger of Crime & Consequences examines Supreme Court Rule 37.3(a) (regarding amicus briefs) in light of the issues presented in Walker v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 7:44 pm by LawDiva
What everyone agrees upon is that this case will undoubtedly end up in the Supreme Court of Canada. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 12:47 pm by James Clark, ACLU of Southern California
Supreme Court allowed the execution to go forward without giving the defense an opportunity to evaluate the drugs, which Arizona had admitted were not manufactured in the United States. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 12:18 pm
On November 3, 2010, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 10:15 am by azatty
As we’ve noted before, a petition submitted to the Arizona Supreme Court to add Indian Law to the state’s bar exam has been tabled for quite some time now. [read post]