Search for: "BROWN v. BROWN" Results 7161 - 7180 of 14,317
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2013, 7:35 am by Natasha Nguyen
However, more recent decisions such as Tarsasag a Szabadsagjogokert v Hungary (2011) 53 EHRR 3 and Kenedi v Hungary App No. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 8:47 am by Bill Marler
An Introduction to Norovirus The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that noroviruses cause nearly 21 million cases of acute gastroenteritis annually, making noroviruses the leading cause of gastroenteritis in adults in the United States. [5, 9, 13, 31]  According to a relatively recent article in the New England Journal of Medicine: The Norwalk agent was the first virus that was identified as causing gastroenteritis in humans, but recognition of its importance as a… [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 7:30 pm by Douglas
Em 2007, quando foi lançado o terceiro filme da série, o crítico Tom Charity, da CNN, afirmou: “a franquia parece à beira do colapso, impelida à construção de vôos cada vez mais grandiosos de fantasia. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 7:30 pm by Douglas
Em 2007, quando foi lançado o terceiro filme da série, o crítico Tom Charity, da CNN, afirmou: “a franquia parece à beira do colapso, impelida à construção de vôos cada vez mais grandiosos de fantasia. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 9:53 am
In a strictly worded memorandum, Ontario Superior Court Justice David Brown says “tactical gamesmanship” by parties has no place in courtrooms funded by public resources.Brown is managing a multi-party commercial dispute that has seen an avalanche of materials and numerous motions but no trial since starting six years ago.The proceedings in Ruggedcom Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 5:00 am by K.O. Herston
Related articles Misrepresentation of Sexual Affair That Violates Prenuptial Agreement Leads to 2-1 Decision in Savannah: Brown v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 5:30 am by koherston
Brown (herstontennesseefamilylaw.com) Fluctuating Child Support Reversed in Hendersonville Post-Divorce Dispute: Allen v. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 10:22 pm by Caroline Ncube
- Bernard Maister, Caspar van Woensel• Sport as a brand and its legal protection in South Africa - Owen Dean• Notes and updates• Comment on the Green Paper for post-school education and training - Shihaam Shaikh• Confusion and the bounds of trade mark monopolies: Foschini v Coetzee - Jeremy Speres• The panados and panadon’ts of trade mark registrations: recent developments regarding trademarks used in the pharmaceutical industry - Marius Roetz• Book… [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang
If it is found that the third parties in this case were negligent then the respondent will be liable under its non-delegable duty of care to the appellant. [1] Brown v Nelson & Ors [1971] LGR 20 [2] Gold v Essex County Council [1942] 2 KB 293, 301 [3] Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343 [4] A (Child) v Ministry of Defence [2005] QB 183, 47 per Lord Phillips of Worth [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang
If it is found that the third parties in this case were negligent then the respondent will be liable under its non-delegable duty of care to the appellant. [1] Brown v Nelson & Ors [1971] LGR 20 [2] Gold v Essex County Council [1942] 2 KB 293, 301 [3] Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343 [4] A (Child) v Ministry of Defence [2005] QB 183, 47 per Lord Phillips of Worth [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
A finding of 100% contributory negligence should never be made: see Part III.G.i. [13] Civil Procedure Rules 1998 (UK), SI 1998/3132, r 44.3(2)(a). [14] Onay v Brown [2009] EWCA Civ 775; Sonmez v Kebabery Wholesale Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 1386. [15] Maes Finance Ltd v AL Phillips & Co (1997) The Times, 25 March (Ch D); Lunnun v Singh (1999) The Times, 19 July (CA). [16] See, eg, Pankhurst v White [2006] EWHC 2093 (QB). [read post]