Search for: "FAIR v. THE STATE" Results 7161 - 7180 of 30,497
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2019, 2:50 pm by Howard Knopf
Here is the provision:Fair and equitable66.501 The Board shall fix royalty and levy rates and any related terms and conditions under this Act that are fair and equitable, in consideration of(a) what would have been agreed upon between a willing buyer and a willing seller acting in a competitive market with all relevant information, at arm’s length and free of external constraints;(b) the public interest;(c) any regulation made under subsection 66.91(1);… [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 6:42 am
DiNapoli, Office of New York State Comptroller, on Sunday, June 16, 2019 Tags: Climate change, Environmental disclosure, ESG, Institutional Investors, New York, Pension funds, Stewardship, Sustainability Mootness Fees Posted by Steven Davidoff Solomon (University of California, Berkeley), on Monday, June 17, 2019 Tags: Class actions, Delaware law, Disclosure, Fairness review, Merger… [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:51 am
In the 1990s, the Church of Scientology’s generated a string of cases in the United States, colloquially known as “Scientology versus the Internet” (referring to: Religious Technology Center v Netcom (1995); Religious Technology Center v F.A.C.T.Net Inc (1995); Religious Technonlogy Center v Lerma (1995)).To understand the significance of these cases, we must go back to an earlier dispute between the Church of Scientology and a former member --… [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 12:45 pm by Jonathan Bailey
Both sides appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and the court reversed the first part of the decision, ruling the thumbnails to be a fair use. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
These steps ensure that the judicial process more fully comprehends the evidential reality of software code and ‘digital systems’, and helps to preserve fairness in legal proceedings. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
As the SCC stated in Clements, at para 21, “to allow recovery where the injury was the result of neutral factors would neither further the goals of compensation, fairness and deterrence, nor comport with the theory of corrective justice that underlies the law of negligence. [read post]