Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 7161 - 7180
of 15,523
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2012, 3:11 pm
By Daniel RichardsonBain v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 6:33 am
By Daniel RichardsonPierce v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 4:19 am
Ronald V. [read post]
27 May 2014, 6:48 am
Wilson v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 1:50 am
The language of rights is useful because it can define figures like Dr Naik in terms of his rights under Article 10, rather than the content of his beliefs, so that his right to speak and his audience’s rights to hear are what important and must be protected, rather than what he believes, or happens to say. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 10:06 am
DAVID JOHNSON V. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 3:00 am
Chief Justice John Roberts cited Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 8:18 am
That’s why, in Utah v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm
(Marko Milanovic, ICJ Indicates Provisional Measures in South Africa v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 7:11 am
In Cordova v. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 12:57 pm
From Corso Ventures, LLC v. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 10:19 am
Some excerpts from Sandmann v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 2:36 pm
From Corso Ventures LLC v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 7:30 am
Al-Bahlul has its roots in Hamdan v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:17 am
Making sense of trade mark conflict in the EUTM systemContinental Reifen Deutschland v Michelin Case C‑84/16 (CJEU) (July 2017)Covered in my earlier IPKat post here, this was the CJEU’s decision to uphold a finding that a figurative trade mark for the letter X could block an EUTM application for a figurative trade mark with the letters XKING for identical goods. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
David Mayer Naman, the OHIM registered the figurative Community trade mark David Mayer (CTM No. [read post]
24 Mar 2018, 7:35 am
Castillo v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 4:27 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 12:17 pm
” Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
