Search for: "In re L. T."
Results 7161 - 7180
of 11,683
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2024, 7:05 am
But they're here to create discord and divisiveness. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 5:00 am
(Edward L White v Westlaw and LexisNexis SDNY 12 Civ 1340 (JSR)). [read post]
9 May 2017, 3:45 am
"[T]he record simply is devoid of any evidence showing a specific and consistent plan to resume use during a period of ten years. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 1:18 pm
By Rebecca Bjork, Dan Blouin, and Gerald L. [read post]
8 Jan 2025, 5:01 am
TTAB Grants Petition to Cancel BLOOKE Registration for Bicycles Use/Nonuse: Precedential No. 18 (Part II): TTAB Grants Petition to Cancel BLOOKE Registration for Bicycles - Nonuse Precedential No. 17: TTAB Rules that Retail Offering of One's Own Goods Qualifies as a "Service" Under the Trademark Act Precedential No. 16: "GABBY'S TABLE" Specimen Fails to Show Use of Mark for Recited On-Line Store Services Precedential No. 14: TTAB Affirms Two Expungement… [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 2:42 am
BTW: the only fishing I do these days is for compliments.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 3:17 am
TTAB Says Application Must Be Verified, Affirms Refusal to RegisterConcurrent Use:Precedential No. 29: TTAB Dissolves Concurrent Use Proceeding, Plaintiff Fails to Prove Prior UsePrecedential No. 15: TTAB Refuses Concurrent Use Registration of DELMONICO'S For Restaurant ServicesRead comments and post your comment here.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 2:45 pm
L, for example, who, despite following the government’s own instructions for seeking asylum — crossing at an official port of entry — had her 7-year-old daughter taken from her with no explanation. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 3:06 am
In re Ms. [read post]
6 Feb 2025, 7:55 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
14 Feb 2025, 3:46 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
7 Feb 2025, 11:25 am
Here’s a screenshot of the K&L Gates website today: Can you spot the difference from this image captured on January 30 from the Wayback Machine: Yes, the “The” is missing! [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
The initial tests of the newly articulated standard for admissibility of opinion testimony in silicone litigation did not go well.[3] Peer review, which was absent in the re-analyses relied upon in the Bendectin litigation, was superficially present in the studies relied upon in the silicone litigation. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 4:22 am
In Re Yero Vicente (procesal civil). [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:03 pm
L. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 9:19 am
ATL-L-6341-10, slip op. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 7:12 am
The SEC is asking, if somebody isn’t putting out any financial information and this is a zone that is ripe for fraud, and investors don’t have what they need, should they be still be quoted or be able to avail themselves of the piggy-back exception? [read post]
5 Jul 2014, 11:02 pm
And that’s a L-O-N-G time. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 7:24 am
Quite right, I think; if you're interested in this general subject, have a look at my Gruesome Speech (Cornell L. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 9:15 am
” In re Elster, No. 20202205 (Fed. [read post]
