Search for: "Reading v. Attorney General" Results 7161 - 7180 of 14,176
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am by Blog Editorial
This is a live blog of the fourth day of the hearing of the “Brexit” appeal. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:58 pm
 Claire considered that in light of this decision, Patent Attorneys must be particularly precise with definitions and the definitions must be reasonable based on the state of the art at the time.At what level of generality should the plausibility test be applied? [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am by Blog Editorial
He submits that this represents a reading of the agreement which fails to take account of the same agreement in its entirety. 14:47: Scoffield QC submits that the North / South cooperation established in the Belfast Agreement was agreed in the context of continuing EU membership. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 8:03 am by cbroden
According to an Associated Press report, the Texas attorney general’s office claims the state “fully complies” with Supreme Court precedents. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 8:03 am by cbroden
According to an Associated Press report, the Texas attorney general’s office claims the state “fully complies” with Supreme Court precedents. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 8:03 am by cbroden
According to an Associated Press report, the Texas attorney general’s office claims the state “fully complies” with Supreme Court precedents. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am by Blog Editorial
Robinson) in which the courts have adopted a different approach towards constitutional statutes. 14:12 John Larkin QC observes the recent trend towards purposive, as against “generous”, construction of statutes (including constitutional statutes). 14:10 John Larkin QC discusses the scope and purpose of s.1 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998, which governs the status of Northern Ireland as part of the United Kingdom. 14:00 John Larkin QC, the Attorney… [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:19 am by John Elwood
” Of encouragement to the veterans in both cases: The court asked for the solicitor general’s views in Howell. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 12:51 pm by Jamie Markham
It is, in short, a federal civil rights lawsuit in which five sex offenders sued the governor, the attorney general, and every elected district attorney in the state to block enforcement of the sex offender premises restrictions on constitutional grounds. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 12:51 pm by Jamie Markham
It is, in short, a federal civil rights lawsuit in which five sex offenders sued the governor, the attorney general, and every elected district attorney in the state to block enforcement of the sex offender premises restrictions on constitutional grounds. [read post]