Search for: "Richard Doeing" Results 7161 - 7180 of 14,141
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2013, 9:54 am by Law Lady
ZOILA GUTIERREZ, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF DILIA DOLORES JAQUEZ, Appellee. 3rd District.Torts -- Premises liability -- Slip and fall -- Discovery -- Surveillance video -- Defendant is not entitled to reconsideration of order requiring defendant to produce to plaintiff, prior to her deposition, a copy of surveillance video which captured plaintiff's fall on defendant's premises -- Defendant's failure to confer with opposing counsel is by itself grounds to deny motion --… [read post]
18 May 2013, 10:55 pm by Dan Flynn
U.S. farm-raised catfish does have a few advantages. [read post]
17 May 2013, 7:17 am by Allison Trzop
Monsanto Co., in which the Court held that the doctrine of patent exhaustion does not allow a farmer to reproduce patented seeds through planting and harvesting without the patent holder’s permission. [read post]
17 May 2013, 3:00 am by Kyle Krull
So, how long does (or can) the IRS scour your financial history to find taxable gifts? [read post]
17 May 2013, 1:37 am
  Some argue that the case does not offer much on how ‘transformative’ should be assessed in the future. [read post]
16 May 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
After a scandal-free first term, and only a few months into his second term, President Barrack Obama is suddenly faced with a series of burgeoning scandals. [read post]
16 May 2013, 8:03 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
” This definition does not rely on any particular Senate procedure and would require judicial “explor[ation] [of] communications between the Senate Minority and the president. [read post]
16 May 2013, 2:32 pm by Barbara S. Mishkin
  The respondent has advised the Court it does not intend to oppose the petition. [read post]
16 May 2013, 8:51 am by Georgialee Lang
” A complicated family, no doubt, but tell me…How does one spend $55,000 a month on two four-year-olds? [read post]
16 May 2013, 6:52 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
Monsanto Co., in which the Court held that the doctrine of patent exhaustion does not allow a farmer to reproduce patented seeds through planting and harvesting without the patent holder’s permission. [read post]
15 May 2013, 10:36 am by Helena Haapio
Law school does not teach us how to enhance the effectiveness of our message. [read post]
15 May 2013, 9:45 am
  By Anjani Mandavia The question of what does or does not constitute “fair use” is probably one of the grayest areas of copyright law. [read post]
15 May 2013, 7:48 am by Conor McEvily
., in which the Court held that the doctrine of patent exhaustion does not allow a farmer to reproduce patented seeds through planting and harvesting without the patent holder’s permission. [read post]
14 May 2013, 7:19 am by Cormac Early
Pelkey that the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 does not preempt state-law claims relating to the storage and disposal of a towed vehicle. [read post]
13 May 2013, 10:23 pm by Cookson Beecher
The recall does not include the dairy’s raw milk products. [read post]
13 May 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Ravenal, Richard Ravenal sought an annulment of his marriage to Cathy on the grounds that the ULC minister who presided over their wedding did not have the authority to solemnize marriages under New York law. [read post]
13 May 2013, 3:39 pm by Rich Vetstein
For these situations, “money talks”, and withholding seller funds is often the only way to ensure that the seller does what he or she has agreed to do. _________________________________________ Richard D. [read post]
13 May 2013, 8:38 am by Sheldon Toplitt
Heeding Lincoln's wisdom, and the requirements of the Copyright Act, we conclude that merely callling someone a copyright owner does not make it so." [read post]
12 May 2013, 9:30 pm by Michael A. Livermore
 This does not mean that cost-benefit analysis is uncontroversial, or that it can always be applied easily in the context of developing countries. [read post]
12 May 2013, 7:34 am by John H Curley
Because the arbitrator’s award can be interpreted in a way consistent with the Act (i.e., that backpay was denied because Palmer lied under oath), we find that the arbitrator’s denial of backpay and credit for time lost does not make the award repugnant to the Act. [read post]