Search for: "State v. B. V." Results 7161 - 7180 of 41,775
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2007, 3:21 am
Loss causation is one of the elements that have to be satisfied in a securities fraud action under § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5. [1] The Supreme Court in Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 1:59 pm
Goldsmith, 526 U.S. 529, 534 (1999) (though Appellate Government erroneously cited that decision as United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:55 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The United States District Court, Southern District, Houston Division, issued an opinion on January 24, 2012, in a case styled, Bender Square Partners v. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 10:29 am by Stephen Bilkis
Petitioner A and Respondent B, residents of the State of Indiana, separated in July 2000. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 3:23 pm by lennyesq
The lawsuit is here: Walt Disney Parks and Resorts v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 7:08 am
 In footnotes, the court cites Georgia Code §§ 16-13-30(b), 16-10-24(b), 40-6-395(a), 40-6-72(b), 40-6-1(a) and 40-8-7(a). [read post]
8 May 2012, 5:16 pm
On April 23, 2012, the United States Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral argument in RadLAX Gateway Hotel v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 2:55 pm
State Citation: 2008 WY 97 Docket Number: 04-180 & 06-255 Appeal from the District Court of Natrona County, the Honorable David B. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Applying the lenient notice-pleading standard afforded to discrimination claims (Vig v New York Hairspray Co., L.P., 67 AD3d 140, 145 [1st Dept 2009]), plaintiff alleged that he was subjected to race discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law (State HRL) (Executive Law § 296) and New York City Human Rights Law (Administrative Code of City of NY § 8-107). [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Applying the lenient notice-pleading standard afforded to discrimination claims (Vig v New York Hairspray Co., L.P., 67 AD3d 140, 145 [1st Dept 2009]), plaintiff alleged that he was subjected to race discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law (State HRL) (Executive Law § 296) and New York City Human Rights Law (Administrative Code of City of NY § 8-107). [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 11:45 am by Eugene Volokh
.'" Indeed, as the court points out in today's Law Offices of Herssein & Herssein, P.A. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 11:45 am by Eugene Volokh
.'" Indeed, as the court points out in today's Law Offices of Herssein & Herssein, P.A. v. [read post]
Nor did the Board err by considering design drawings submitted by the review petitioner as proof of design elements that were known in the art at the critical time of the challenged patents (B/E Aerospace, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2007, 3:51 am
With respect to the breach of contract claim , Holland based his claim on an express contractual provision stating that "the parties hereto shall deal with one another fairly and in good faith. [read post]