Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 7161 - 7180 of 9,092
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2010, 3:46 pm by Anna Christensen
United States (09-6338) Argued: Mar. 30, 2010 Issue: (1) Whether the Federal Sentencing Guidelines are binding when a district court imposes a new sentence pursuant to a revised guideline range under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am by Andrew Hamm
Since 1968, only three justices — Lewis Powell, William Rehnquist and Elena Kagan — have lacked judicial experience prior to joining the court. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 7:41 am by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
Florida’s 5th District Court of Appeal reversed the trial court. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 8:47 am by Josh Blackman
The Supreme Court does not have the power of judicial universality. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am by John Elwood
Our first petition seeking Fame is Manuel v. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 10:09 pm
This court reviews district court findings regarding underlying disputed facts for clear error. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 5:01 am by Quinta Jurecic, Molly E. Reynolds
District Court for the District of Columbia that the information sought by the committee “is relevant only to serve the Select Committee’s stated purpose of engaging in ad-hoc law enforcement and its unstated purpose of antagonizing its political adversaries. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:36 am by John Elwood
The district court and First Circuit disagreed, citing United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 6:39 am
In the midst of the media frenzy and for the first time, the cosmetics industry officially declared formaldehyde unsafe at any level in chemical hair straightening products, commonly referred to as keratin-based or the Brazilian Blowout. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 6:39 am
In the midst of the media frenzy and for the first time, the cosmetics industry officially declared formaldehyde unsafe at any level in chemical hair straightening products, commonly referred to as keratin-based or the Brazilian Blowout. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 9:07 pm by Jaclyn Kelley-Widmer
Following this apparent defiance of the Supreme Court’s ruling, a federal district court issued a decision explicitly stating that the Administration must restore DACA to its pre-September 2017 status, which means accepting new applications. [read post]